]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/kernel/stable.git/commitdiff
x86, sched: Fix the AMD CPPC maximum performance value on certain AMD Ryzen generations
authorHuang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Sun, 25 Apr 2021 07:34:51 +0000 (15:34 +0800)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Wed, 19 May 2021 08:29:49 +0000 (10:29 +0200)
commit 3743d55b289c203d8f77b7cd47c24926b9d186ae upstream.

Some AMD Ryzen generations has different calculation method on maximum
performance. 255 is not for all ASICs, some specific generations should use 166
as the maximum performance. Otherwise, it will report incorrect frequency value
like below:

  ~ → lscpu | grep MHz
  CPU MHz:                         3400.000
  CPU max MHz:                     7228.3198
  CPU min MHz:                     2200.0000

[ mingo: Tidied up whitespace use. ]
[ Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>: fix 225 -> 255 typo. ]

Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems")
Fixes: 3c55e94c0ade ("cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies")
Reported-by: Jason Bagavatsingham <jason.bagavatsingham@gmail.com>
Fixed-by: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jason Bagavatsingham <jason.bagavatsingham@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210425073451.2557394-1-ray.huang@amd.com
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211791
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c

index c66df6368909f7d281dd95a5e83e270ff282ebca..ea72b3d83240a3ad7478f772b3f8b15fb0b5c02f 100644 (file)
@@ -805,8 +805,10 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(u64, msr_misc_features_shadow);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD
 extern u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void);
+extern u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void);
 #else
 static inline u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void)       { return 0; }
+static inline u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void)           { return 0; }
 #endif
 
 static inline uint32_t hypervisor_cpuid_base(const char *sig, uint32_t leaves)
index 347a956f71ca098b8423ba96d64ce394352b16c3..eedb2b320946fda40194f3117c73d3b238cd538e 100644 (file)
@@ -1170,3 +1170,19 @@ void set_dr_addr_mask(unsigned long mask, int dr)
                break;
        }
 }
+
+u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void)
+{
+       struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
+
+       if (c->x86 == 0x17 && ((c->x86_model >= 0x30 && c->x86_model < 0x40) ||
+                              (c->x86_model >= 0x70 && c->x86_model < 0x80)))
+               return 166;
+
+       if (c->x86 == 0x19 && ((c->x86_model >= 0x20 && c->x86_model < 0x30) ||
+                              (c->x86_model >= 0x40 && c->x86_model < 0x70)))
+               return 166;
+
+       return 255;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_highest_perf);
index 6b08d1eb173fd34e44c662ed2a4ad207425d0e06..363b36bbd791ab801db230b15fa00f5630377aad 100644 (file)
@@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static bool amd_set_max_freq_ratio(void)
                return false;
        }
 
-       highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf;
+       highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf();
        nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf;
 
        if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) {
index d1bbc16fba4b4c9881ba88c3e039cc63ddd91b1a..7e7450453714d3d77d3a0cec0020a2edb6e9e8e7 100644 (file)
@@ -646,7 +646,11 @@ static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu)
                return 0;
        }
 
-       highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf;
+       if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
+               highest_perf = amd_get_highest_perf();
+       else
+               highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf;
+
        nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf;
 
        if (!highest_perf || !nominal_perf) {