There is a warning in the kerneldoc documentation of container_of() that
constness of its ptr argument is lost. While this is a valid suggestion
container_of_const() should be used instead, the vast majority of new
code still uses container_of():
$ git diff v6.13 v6.14|grep container_of\(|wc -l
646
$ git diff v6.13 v6.14|grep container_of_const|wc -l
9
Make an explicit recommendation to use container_of_const().
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250520103437.468691-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* @member: the name of the member within the struct.
*
* WARNING: any const qualifier of @ptr is lost.
+ * Do not use container_of() in new code.
*/
#define container_of(ptr, type, member) ({ \
void *__mptr = (void *)(ptr); \
* @ptr: the pointer to the member
* @type: the type of the container struct this is embedded in.
* @member: the name of the member within the struct.
+ *
+ * Always prefer container_of_const() instead of container_of() in new code.
*/
#define container_of_const(ptr, type, member) \
_Generic(ptr, \