Report syntax error for invalid letter-spec in IMPLICIT statements
for derived types and not an ICE.
Original patch by Steve Kargl. Added test cases based on those
provided by G. Steinmetz in the PR.
2020-06-23 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
gcc/fortran/
PR fortran/95586
* decl.c (gfc_match_implicit): Only perform else branch if
the type spect is not BT_DERIVED.
2020-06-23 Mark Eggleston <markeggleston@gcc.gnu.org>
gcc/testsuite/
PR fortran/95586
* gfortran.dg/pr95586_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/pr95586_2.f90: New test.
/* Last chance -- check <TYPE> <SELECTOR> (<RANGE>). */
if (ts.type == BT_CHARACTER)
m = gfc_match_char_spec (&ts);
- else
+ else if (ts.type != BT_DERIVED)
{
m = gfc_match_kind_spec (&ts, false);
if (m == MATCH_NO)
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+
+program test
+ implicit type(t) (1) ! { dg-error "Syntax error" }
+ type t
+ end type
+end program
+
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+
+program test
+ integer, parameter :: n1 = 1
+ implicit type(t) (n1) ! { dg-error "Syntax error" }
+ type t
+ end type
+end program
+
+