commit
58029c39cdc54ac4f4dc40b4a9c05eed9f9b808a upstream.
Some operations require checking, or ignoring, specific bits in an address
value. For example, this can be comparing address values to identify unique
structures.
Currently, the full address value is compared when filtering for duplicates.
This results in over counting and creation of extra records. This gives the
impression that more unique events occurred than did in reality.
Mask the address for physical rows on MI300.
[ bp: Simplify. ]
Fixes: 6f15e617cc99 ("RAS: Introduce a FRU memory poison manager")
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
atl_debug(ctx, "Unrecognized interleave mode: %u", ctx->map.intlv_mode);
}
+#define MI300_UMC_MCA_COL GENMASK(5, 1)
+#define MI300_UMC_MCA_ROW13 BIT(23)
+
#endif /* __AMD_ATL_INTERNAL_H__ */
* Additionally, the PC and Bank bits may be hashed. This must be accounted for before
* reconstructing the normalized address.
*/
-#define MI300_UMC_MCA_COL GENMASK(5, 1)
#define MI300_UMC_MCA_BANK GENMASK(9, 6)
#define MI300_UMC_MCA_ROW GENMASK(24, 10)
#define MI300_UMC_MCA_PC BIT(25)
*
* See MI300_UMC_MCA_ROW for the row bits in MCA_ADDR_UMC value.
*/
-#define MI300_UMC_MCA_ROW13 BIT(23)
static void retire_row_mi300(struct atl_err *a_err)
{
_retire_row_mi300(a_err);
return true;
}
+/*
+ * Row retirement is done on MI300 systems, and some bits are 'don't
+ * care' for comparing addresses with unique physical rows. This
+ * includes all column bits and the row[13] bit.
+ */
+#define MASK_ADDR(addr) ((addr) & ~(MI300_UMC_MCA_ROW13 | MI300_UMC_MCA_COL))
+
static bool fpds_equal(struct cper_fru_poison_desc *old, struct cper_fru_poison_desc *new)
{
/*
*
* Also, order the checks from most->least likely to fail to shortcut the code.
*/
- if (old->addr != new->addr)
+ if (MASK_ADDR(old->addr) != MASK_ADDR(new->addr))
return false;
if (old->hw_id != new->hw_id)