I originally defined std::remove_cvref_t in terms of the internal
__remove_cvref_t trait, to avoid instantiating the remove_cvref class
template. However, as described in P1715R0 that is observable by users
and is thus non-conforming.
This defines remove_cvref_t as specified in the standard.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/type_traits (remove_cvref_t): Define in terms of
remove_cvref.
* testsuite/20_util/remove_cvref/value.cc: Check alias.
(cherry picked from commit
0e79e63026e43ad0577812ffb405dac8fa88af5b)
/// Remove references and cv-qualifiers.
template<typename _Tp>
struct remove_cvref
- {
- using type = __remove_cvref_t<_Tp>;
- };
+ : remove_cv<_Tp>
+ { };
+
+ template<typename _Tp>
+ struct remove_cvref<_Tp&>
+ : remove_cv<_Tp>
+ { };
+
+ template<typename _Tp>
+ struct remove_cvref<_Tp&&>
+ : remove_cv<_Tp>
+ { };
template<typename _Tp>
- using remove_cvref_t = __remove_cvref_t<_Tp>;
+ using remove_cvref_t = typename remove_cvref<_Tp>::type;
#define __cpp_lib_type_identity 201806L
/// Identity metafunction.
static_assert(is_same<typename remove_cvref<const int(&)()>::type,
const int()>::value, "");
}
+
+// Declare using nested name of class template
+template<typename T> T func(typename std::remove_cvref<T>::type);
+// Define using alias
+template<typename T> T func(std::remove_cvref_t<T> t) { return t; }
+// Call must not be ambiguous
+int i = func<int>(1);