In non-dependent23.C below we expect the Base::foo calls to
resolve to the second, third and fourth overloads respectively in light
of the cv-qualifiers of 'this' in each case. But ever since
r12-6075-g2decd2cabe5a4f, the calls incorrectly resolve to the first
overload at instantiation time.
This happens because the calls to Base::foo are all deemed
non-dependent (ever since
r7-755-g23cb72663051cd made us ignore 'this'
dependence when considering the dependence of a non-static memfn call),
hence we end up checking the call ahead of time, using as the object
argument a dummy object of type Base. Since this object argument is
cv-unqualified, the calls in turn resolve to the unqualified overload
of baseDevice. Before r12-6075 this incorrect result would just get
silently discarded and we'd end up redoing OR at instantiation time
using 'this' as the object argument. But after r12-6075 we now reuse
this incorrect result at instantiation time.
This patch fixes this by making maybe_dummy_object respect the cv-quals
of (the non-lambda) 'this' when returning a dummy object. Thus, ahead
of time OR using a dummy object will give us the right answer that's
consistent with the instantiation time answer.
An earlier version of this patch didn't handle 'this'-capturing lambdas
correctly, which broke lambda-this22.C below.
PR c++/105637
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* tree.cc (maybe_dummy_object): When returning a dummy
object, respect the cv-quals of 'this' if available.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-this22.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/non-dependent23.C: New test.
if (binfop)
*binfop = binfo;
- if (current_class_ref
- /* current_class_ref might not correspond to current_class_type if
- we're in tsubst_default_argument or a lambda-declarator; in either
- case, we want to use current_class_ref if it matches CONTEXT. */
- && (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p
- (TREE_TYPE (current_class_ref), context)))
+ /* current_class_ref might not correspond to current_class_type if
+ we're in tsubst_default_argument or a lambda-declarator; in either
+ case, we want to use current_class_ref if it matches CONTEXT. */
+ tree ctype = current_class_ref ? TREE_TYPE (current_class_ref) : NULL_TREE;
+ if (ctype
+ && same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (ctype, context))
decl = current_class_ref;
else
- decl = build_dummy_object (context);
+ {
+ /* Return a dummy object whose cv-quals are consistent with (the
+ non-lambda) 'this' if available. */
+ if (ctype)
+ {
+ int quals = TYPE_UNQUALIFIED;
+ if (tree lambda = CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR (ctype))
+ {
+ if (tree cap = lambda_expr_this_capture (lambda, false))
+ quals = cp_type_quals (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (cap)));
+ }
+ else
+ quals = cp_type_quals (ctype);
+ context = cp_build_qualified_type (context, quals);
+ }
+ decl = build_dummy_object (context);
+ }
return decl;
}
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/105637
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct Base {
+ void foo(); // #1
+ void foo() const = delete; // #2
+};
+
+template<class T>
+struct TopClass : T {
+ void failsToCompile() {
+ [this] { Base::foo(); }(); // should select #2, not #1
+ }
+
+ void failsToCompile() const {
+ [this] { Base::foo(); }(); // { dg-error "deleted" }
+ }
+};
+
+template struct TopClass<Base>;
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/105637
+
+struct Base {
+ void foo(); // #1
+ void foo() const; // #2
+ void foo() volatile; // #3
+ void foo() const volatile; // #4
+};
+
+template<class T>
+struct TopClass : T {
+ void failsToCompile() const {
+ Base::foo(); // should select #2, not #1
+ }
+
+ void failsToCompile() volatile {
+ Base::foo(); // should select #3, not #1
+ }
+
+ void failsToCompile() const volatile {
+ Base::foo(); // should select #4, not #1
+ }
+};
+
+template struct TopClass<Base>;