+2005-12-05 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
+
+ * parse.y (patch_new_array_init): Don't set length on array.
+
2005-12-02 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
* java-gimplify.c (java_gimplify_labeled_block_expr): Use
/* Create a new type. We can't reuse the one we have here by
patching its dimension because it originally is of dimension -1
- hence reused by gcc. This would prevent triangular arrays. */
- type = build_java_array_type (element_type, length);
+ hence reused by gcc. This would prevent triangular arrays.
+ Note that we don't pass the length here. If we do that then the
+ length will end up in the signature of this type, and hence in
+ the signature of the anonymous constructor -- but this is not a
+ valid java signature. */
+ type = build_java_array_type (element_type, -1);
TREE_TYPE (init) = TREE_TYPE (TREE_CHAIN (TREE_CHAIN (TYPE_FIELDS (type))));
TREE_TYPE (node) = promote_type (type);
TREE_CONSTANT (init) = all_constant;
+2005-12-05 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
+
+ * testsuite/libjava.compile/rh174912.java: New file.
+
2005-12-01 Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com>
* testsuite/lib/libjava.exp (test_libjava_from_javac): Support
--- /dev/null
+// Derived from Red Hat bugzilla 174912
+// https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174912
+// The bug is that the anonymous class constructor here will end up
+// with a bogus '[3C' in its signature.
+
+public class rh174912 {
+ public rh174912(char[][] args) { }
+
+ public Object m() {
+ return new rh174912(new char[][] { "hi".toCharArray(),
+ "bob".toCharArray(),
+ "and joe".toCharArray() }) {
+ };
+ }
+
+ public static void main(String[] args) { }
+}