The manual references asm goto as being implicitly volatile already
and that was done when asm goto could not have outputs. When outputs
were added to `asm goto`, only asm goto without outputs were still being
marked as volatile. Now some parts of GCC decide, removing the `asm goto`
is ok if the output is not used, though not updating the CFG (this happens
on both the RTL level and the gimple level). Since the biggest user of `asm goto`
is the Linux kernel and they expect them to be volatile (they use them to
copy to/from userspace), we should just mark the inline-asm as volatile.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
PR middle-end/110420
PR middle-end/103979
PR middle-end/98619
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimplify.cc (gimplify_asm_expr): Mark asm with labels as volatile.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.c-torture/compile/asmgoto-6.c: New test.
stmt = gimple_build_asm_vec (TREE_STRING_POINTER (ASM_STRING (expr)),
inputs, outputs, clobbers, labels);
- gimple_asm_set_volatile (stmt, ASM_VOLATILE_P (expr) || noutputs == 0);
+ /* asm is volatile if it was marked by the user as volatile or
+ there are no outputs or this is an asm goto. */
+ gimple_asm_set_volatile (stmt,
+ ASM_VOLATILE_P (expr)
+ || noutputs == 0
+ || labels);
gimple_asm_set_input (stmt, ASM_INPUT_P (expr));
gimple_asm_set_inline (stmt, ASM_INLINE_P (expr));
--- /dev/null
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* PR middle-end/110420 */
+/* PR middle-end/103979 */
+/* PR middle-end/98619 */
+/* Test that the middle-end does not remove the asm goto
+ with an output. */
+
+static int t;
+void g(void);
+
+void f(void)
+{
+ int __gu_val;
+ asm goto("#my asm "
+ : "=&r"(__gu_val)
+ :
+ :
+ : Efault);
+ t = __gu_val;
+ g();
+Efault:
+}
+
+/* Make sure "my asm " is still in the assembly. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "my asm " } } */