The order of function calls in the disable operation should be the reverse
of that in the enable operation. Thus, reorder the function calls to first
disable the parent IRQ chip before disabling the TINT IRQ.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com> # on RZ/G3S
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240606194813.676823-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com
static void rzg2l_irqc_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
{
- rzg2l_tint_irq_endisable(d, false);
irq_chip_disable_parent(d);
+ rzg2l_tint_irq_endisable(d, false);
}
static void rzg2l_irqc_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)