promote, assuage

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@595658 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 787b99b136dac0e56a518b05b48039f7bd9083d7..1788f96a8994e4427301425891e649a7e96ad484 100644 (file)
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -84,6 +84,18 @@ PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
          http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=591488 
      +1: covener, rpluem, rederpj
 
+   * mod_ldap: Don't return references into shared memory to the caller, 
+     as these may expire at any time because callers don't hold
+     a cache lock
+         http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=591499
+         http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=593919 
+     +1: covener, rpluem, rederpj
+     rederpj: Though it should never be a problem (famous last words), should
+              there be some sort of verification of i vs. k? (since you
+              allocate based on k and copy based on i)
+     covener: attrs/vals are defined as being the same length and null terminated,
+              we just need to count the length of one to allocate the other
+
 PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
   [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
 
@@ -246,15 +258,6 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
          Trunk version of patch works
       +1: rpluem, trawick
 
-   * mod_ldap: Don't return references into shared memory to the caller, 
-     as these may expire at any time because callers don't hold
-     a cache lock
-         http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=591499
-         http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=593919 
-     +1: covener, rpluem, rederpj
-     rederpj: Though it should never be a problem (famous last words), should
-              there be some sort of verification of i vs. k? (since you
-              allocate based on k and copy based on i)
 
    * mod_ssl: Don't use the pconf pool for allocating memory pointed by
      a local static variable. PR 43865.