Since the return value of vring_unmap_one_split() is exactly
vq->split.desc_extra[i].next, 'i = vq->split.desc_extra[i].next' is
redundant. Assign vring_unmap_one_split() to i instead.
Since vq->split.desc_extra is assigned to extra, use extra[i].next
instead of vq->split.desc_extra[i].next to improve readability.
No change in functionality.
Signed-off-by: zhangdongchuan <zhangdongchuan@eswincomputing.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <
202511261140162936986@eswincomputing.com>
i = head;
while (vq->split.vring.desc[i].flags & nextflag) {
- vring_unmap_one_split(vq, &extra[i]);
- i = vq->split.desc_extra[i].next;
+ i = vring_unmap_one_split(vq, &extra[i]);
vq->vq.num_free++;
}
vring_unmap_one_split(vq, &extra[i]);
- vq->split.desc_extra[i].next = vq->free_head;
+ extra[i].next = vq->free_head;
vq->free_head = head;
/* Plus final descriptor */