Repeat calls of static_branch_enable() to an already enabled
static key introduce overhead, because it calls cpus_read_lock().
Users may frequently set the uclamp value of tasks, triggering
the repeat enabling of the sched_uclamp_used static key.
Optimize this and avoid repeat calls to static_branch_enable()
by checking whether it's enabled already.
[ mingo: Rewrote the changelog for legibility ]
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250219093747.2612-2-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com
}
if (update_root_tg) {
- static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
+ sched_uclamp_enable();
uclamp_update_root_tg();
}
if (old_min_rt != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min_rt_default) {
- static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
+ sched_uclamp_enable();
uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_default();
}
if (req.ret)
return req.ret;
- static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
+ sched_uclamp_enable();
guard(mutex)(&uclamp_mutex);
guard(rcu)();
return static_branch_likely(&sched_uclamp_used);
}
+/*
+ * Enabling static branches would get the cpus_read_lock(),
+ * check whether uclamp_is_used before enable it to avoid always
+ * calling cpus_read_lock(). Because we never disable this
+ * static key once enable it.
+ */
+static inline void sched_uclamp_enable(void)
+{
+ if (!uclamp_is_used())
+ static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
+}
+
static inline unsigned long uclamp_rq_get(struct rq *rq,
enum uclamp_id clamp_id)
{
return false;
}
+static inline void sched_uclamp_enable(void) {}
+
static inline unsigned long
uclamp_rq_get(struct rq *rq, enum uclamp_id clamp_id)
{
* blocking operation which obviously cannot be done while holding
* scheduler locks.
*/
- static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
+ sched_uclamp_enable();
return 0;
}