* Cast vote and add some comments

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x@570074 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index a64174d30d2ae2055b7a9feb04572c89fa51f754..c14b2cf828d6b9276b009ed598f2272156c84417 100644 (file)
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -165,6 +165,10 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
       adjusted for 2.0 including both patches;
         http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/r568779-backport-2.0-r2.patch
         +1: wrowe
+        rpluem says: What is the reason for the patch to Makefile.in in your
+        proposal? Besides I think
+        sed 's#i^LIBTOOL = \(.*\)#LIBTOOL = $(SHELL) $(installbuilddir)/libtool $(LTFLAGS)#'
+        is wrong (Note the i before ^).
       and prior to r569934;
         +1: rpluem
 
@@ -175,6 +179,9 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
       Backported to 2.0 (on top of log core patch, above);
         http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/r569535-backport-2.0.patch
       +1: wrowe
+      -1: rpluem: It does not apply to 2.0. Even if
+          http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/r568326-backport-2.0-r2.patch
+          is applied first.
 
     * mod_ssl: Version reporting update; displays 'compiled against'
       Apache and build-time SSL Library versions at loglevel [info],
@@ -185,7 +192,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
         http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=520701
       Backported to 2.0 (applies with a bit of fuzz);
         http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/r520701-backport-2.2.patch
-      +1: wrowe
+      +1: wrowe, rpluem
 
 
 PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON: