Several gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-?.c tests FAIL on 32 and 64-bit
Solaris/SPARC:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-3.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-5.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
The dumps show
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c:7:30:
note: ==> examining statement: _3 = *_2;
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c:7:30:
missed: unsupported unaligned access
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c:8:6:
missed: not vectorized: relevant stmt not supported: _3 = *_2;
so I think the tests need to require vect_hw_misalign. This is what
this patch does.
Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11.
2024-02-22 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
gcc/testsuite:
PR tree-optimization/98238
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-1.c (scan-tree-dump): Also require
vect_hw_misalign.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-3.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-cost-model-5.c: Likewise.
x[i] += y[i];
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {LOOP VECTORIZED} vect { target vect_int } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {LOOP VECTORIZED} vect { target { vect_int && vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
x[i] += y[i];
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {LOOP VECTORIZED} vect { target vect_int } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {LOOP VECTORIZED} vect { target { vect_int && vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
x[i] += y[i];
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {LOOP VECTORIZED} vect { target vect_int } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {LOOP VECTORIZED} vect { target { vect_int && vect_hw_misalign } } } } */