it's quite unlikely this expunge was caused by some bug. */
uint32_t uid1, uid2;
- if (next_exp->seq1 > ctx->view->map->records_count ||
- next_exp->seq2 > ctx->view->map->records_count) {
- mail_transaction_log_view_set_corrupted(
- ctx->view->log_view, "Expunge range %u..%u "
- "larger than message count %u",
- next_exp->seq1, next_exp->seq2,
- ctx->view->map->records_count);
+ mail_index_sync_get_expunge(sync_rec, next_exp);
+ if (mail_index_sync_rec_check(ctx->view, sync_rec) < 0)
return -1;
- }
if (mail_index_lookup_uid(ctx->view, next_exp->seq1, &uid1) < 0)
return -1;
return -1;
}
- mail_index_sync_get_expunge(sync_rec, next_exp);
ctx->expunge_idx++;
/* scan updates again from the beginning */
ctx->update_idx = 0;
ctx->next_seq = next_exp->seq2;
- return mail_index_sync_rec_check(ctx->view, sync_rec);
+ return 1;
}
if (ctx->sync_appends) {