exclude_file_name_regexp--sc_prohibit_setuid = ^src/util/virutil\.c|tools/virt-login-shell\.c$$
exclude_file_name_regexp--sc_prohibit_snprintf = \
- ^(build-aux/syntax-check\.mk|docs/hacking\.rst|tools/virt-login-shell\.c)$$
+ ^(build-aux/syntax-check\.mk|docs/coding-style\.rst|tools/virt-login-shell\.c)$$
exclude_file_name_regexp--sc_prohibit_strtol = ^examples/.*$$
--- /dev/null
+============
+Coding style
+============
+
+.. contents::
+
+Naming conventions
+==================
+
+When reading libvirt code, a number of different naming
+conventions will be evident due to various changes in thinking
+over the course of the project's lifetime. The conventions
+documented below should be followed when creating any entirely new
+files in libvirt. When working on existing files, while it is
+desirable to apply these conventions, keeping a consistent style
+with existing code in that particular file is generally more
+important. The overall guiding principal is that every file, enum,
+struct, function, macro and typedef name must have a 'vir' or
+'VIR' prefix. All local scope variable names are exempt, and
+global variables are exempt, unless exported in a header file.
+
+File names
+ File naming varies depending on the subdirectory. The preferred
+ style is to have a 'vir' prefix, followed by a name which
+ matches the name of the functions / objects inside the file.
+ For example, a file containing an object 'virHashtable' is
+ stored in files 'virhashtable.c' and 'virhashtable.h'.
+ Sometimes, methods which would otherwise be declared 'static'
+ need to be exported for use by a test suite. For this purpose a
+ second header file should be added with a suffix of 'priv',
+ e.g. 'virhashtablepriv.h'. Use of underscores in file names is
+ discouraged when using the 'vir' prefix style. The 'vir' prefix
+ naming applies to src/util, src/rpc and tests/ directories.
+ Most other directories do not follow this convention.
+
+Enum type & field names
+ All enums should have a 'vir' prefix in their typedef name, and
+ each following word should have its first letter in uppercase.
+ The enum name should match the typedef name with a leading
+ underscore. The enum member names should be in all uppercase,
+ and use an underscore to separate each word. The enum member
+ name prefix should match the enum typedef name.
+
+ ::
+
+ typedef enum _virSocketType virSocketType;
+ enum _virSocketType {
+ VIR_SOCKET_TYPE_IPV4,
+ VIR_SOCKET_TYPE_IPV6,
+ };
+
+Struct type names
+ All structs should have a 'vir' prefix in their typedef name,
+ and each following word should have its first letter in
+ uppercase. The struct name should be the same as the typedef
+ name with a leading underscore. A second typedef should be
+ given for a pointer to the struct with a 'Ptr' suffix.
+
+ ::
+
+ typedef struct _virHashTable virHashTable;
+ typedef virHashTable *virHashTablePtr;
+ struct _virHashTable {
+ ...
+ };
+
+Function names
+ All functions should have a 'vir' prefix in their name,
+ followed by one or more words with first letter of each word
+ capitalized. Underscores should not be used in function names.
+ If the function is operating on an object, then the function
+ name prefix should match the object typedef name, otherwise it
+ should match the filename. Following this comes the verb /
+ action name, and finally an optional subject name. For example,
+ given an object 'virHashTable', all functions should have a
+ name 'virHashTable$VERB' or 'virHashTable$VERB$SUBJECT", e.g.
+ 'virHashTableLookup' or 'virHashTableGetValue'.
+
+Macro names
+ All macros should have a "VIR" prefix in their name, followed
+ by one or more uppercase words separated by underscores. The
+ macro argument names should be in lowercase. Aside from having
+ a "VIR" prefix there are no common practices for the rest of
+ the macro name.
+
+Code indentation
+================
+
+Libvirt's C source code generally adheres to some basic
+code-formatting conventions. The existing code base is not totally
+consistent on this front, but we do prefer that contributed code
+be formatted similarly. In short, use spaces-not-TABs for
+indentation, use 4 spaces for each indentation level, and other
+than that, follow the K&R style.
+
+If you use Emacs, the project includes a file .dir-locals.el that
+sets up the preferred indentation. If you use vim, append the
+following to your ~/.vimrc file:
+
+::
+
+ set nocompatible
+ filetype on
+ set autoindent
+ set smartindent
+ set cindent
+ set tabstop=8
+ set shiftwidth=4
+ set expandtab
+ set cinoptions=(0,:0,l1,t0,L3
+ filetype plugin indent on
+ au FileType make setlocal noexpandtab
+ au BufRead,BufNewFile *.am setlocal noexpandtab
+ match ErrorMsg /\s\+$\| \+\ze\t/
+
+Or if you don't want to mess your ~/.vimrc up, you can save the
+above into a file called .lvimrc (not .vimrc) located at the root
+of libvirt source, then install a vim script from
+http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1408, which will
+load the .lvimrc only when you edit libvirt code.
+
+Code formatting (especially for new code)
+=========================================
+
+With new code, we can be even more strict. Please apply the
+following function (using GNU indent) to any new code. Note that
+this also gives you an idea of the type of spacing we prefer
+around operators and keywords:
+
+::
+
+ indent-libvirt()
+ {
+ indent -bad -bap -bbb -bli4 -br -ce -brs -cs -i4 -l75 -lc75 \
+ -sbi4 -psl -saf -sai -saw -sbi4 -ss -sc -cdw -cli4 -npcs -nbc \
+ --no-tabs "$@"
+ }
+
+Note that sometimes you'll have to post-process that output
+further, by piping it through ``expand -i``, since some leading
+TABs can get through. Usually they're in macro definitions or
+strings, and should be converted anyhow.
+
+Libvirt requires a C99 compiler for various reasons. However, most
+of the code base prefers to stick to C89 syntax unless there is a
+compelling reason otherwise. For example, it is preferable to use
+``/* */`` comments rather than ``//``. Also, when declaring local
+variables, the prevailing style has been to declare them at the
+beginning of a scope, rather than immediately before use.
+
+Bracket spacing
+---------------
+
+The keywords ``if``, ``for``, ``while``, and ``switch`` must have
+a single space following them before the opening bracket. E.g.
+
+::
+
+ if(foo) // Bad
+ if (foo) // Good
+
+Function implementations must **not** have any whitespace between
+the function name and the opening bracket. E.g.
+
+::
+
+ int foo (int wizz) // Bad
+ int foo(int wizz) // Good
+
+Function calls must **not** have any whitespace between the
+function name and the opening bracket. E.g.
+
+::
+
+ bar = foo (wizz); // Bad
+ bar = foo(wizz); // Good
+
+Function typedefs must **not** have any whitespace between the
+closing bracket of the function name and opening bracket of the
+arg list. E.g.
+
+::
+
+ typedef int (*foo) (int wizz); // Bad
+ typedef int (*foo)(int wizz); // Good
+
+There must not be any whitespace immediately following any opening
+bracket, or immediately prior to any closing bracket. E.g.
+
+::
+
+ int foo( int wizz ); // Bad
+ int foo(int wizz); // Good
+
+Commas
+------
+
+Commas should always be followed by a space or end of line, and
+never have leading space; this is enforced during 'make
+syntax-check'.
+
+::
+
+ call(a,b ,c);// Bad
+ call(a, b, c); // Good
+
+When declaring an enum or using a struct initializer that occupies
+more than one line, use a trailing comma. That way, future edits
+to extend the list only have to add a line, rather than modify an
+existing line to add the intermediate comma. Any sentinel
+enumerator value with a name ending in \_LAST is exempt, since you
+would extend such an enum before the \_LAST element. Another
+reason to favor trailing commas is that it requires less effort to
+produce via code generators. Note that the syntax checker is
+unable to enforce a style of trailing commas, so there are
+counterexamples in existing code which do not use it; also, while
+C99 allows trailing commas, remember that JSON and XDR do not.
+
+::
+
+ enum {
+ VALUE_ONE,
+ VALUE_TWO // Bad
+ };
+ enum {
+ VALUE_THREE,
+ VALUE_FOUR, // Good
+ };
+
+Semicolons
+----------
+
+Semicolons should never have a space beforehand. Inside the
+condition of a ``for`` loop, there should always be a space or
+line break after each semicolon, except for the special case of an
+infinite loop (although more infinite loops use ``while``). While
+not enforced, loop counters generally use post-increment.
+
+::
+
+ for (i = 0 ;i < limit ; ++i) { // Bad
+ for (i = 0; i < limit; i++) { // Good
+ for (;;) { // ok
+ while (1) { // Better
+
+Empty loop bodies are better represented with curly braces and a
+comment, although use of a semicolon is not currently rejected.
+
+::
+
+ while ((rc = waitpid(pid, &st, 0) == -1) &&
+ errno == EINTR); // ok
+ while ((rc = waitpid(pid, &st, 0) == -1) &&
+ errno == EINTR) { // Better
+ /* nothing */
+ }
+
+Curly braces
+------------
+
+Omit the curly braces around an ``if``, ``while``, ``for`` etc.
+body only when both that body and the condition itself occupy a
+single line. In every other case we require the braces. This
+ensures that it is trivially easy to identify a
+single-\ *statement* loop: each has only one *line* in its body.
+
+::
+
+ while (expr) // single line body; {} is forbidden
+ single_line_stmt();
+
+::
+
+ while (expr(arg1,
+ arg2)) // indentation makes it obvious it is single line,
+ single_line_stmt(); // {} is optional (not enforced either way)
+
+::
+
+ while (expr1 &&
+ expr2) { // multi-line, at same indentation, {} required
+ single_line_stmt();
+ }
+
+However, the moment your loop/if/else body extends on to a second
+line, for whatever reason (even if it's just an added comment),
+then you should add braces. Otherwise, it would be too easy to
+insert a statement just before that comment (without adding
+braces), thinking it is already a multi-statement loop:
+
+::
+
+ while (true) // BAD! multi-line body with no braces
+ /* comment... */
+ single_line_stmt();
+
+Do this instead:
+
+::
+
+ while (true) { // Always put braces around a multi-line body.
+ /* comment... */
+ single_line_stmt();
+ }
+
+There is one exception: when the second body line is not at the
+same indentation level as the first body line:
+
+::
+
+ if (expr)
+ die("a diagnostic that would make this line"
+ " extend past the 80-column limit"));
+
+It is safe to omit the braces in the code above, since the
+further-indented second body line makes it obvious that this is
+still a single-statement body.
+
+To reiterate, don't do this:
+
+::
+
+ if (expr) // BAD: no braces around...
+ while (expr_2) { // ... a multi-line body
+ ...
+ }
+
+Do this, instead:
+
+::
+
+ if (expr) {
+ while (expr_2) {
+ ...
+ }
+ }
+
+However, there is one exception in the other direction, when even
+a one-line block should have braces. That occurs when that
+one-line, brace-less block is an ``if`` or ``else`` block, and the
+counterpart block **does** use braces. In that case, put braces
+around both blocks. Also, if the ``else`` block is much shorter
+than the ``if`` block, consider negating the ``if``-condition and
+swapping the bodies, putting the short block first and making the
+longer, multi-line block be the ``else`` block.
+
+::
+
+ if (expr) {
+ ...
+ ...
+ }
+ else
+ x = y; // BAD: braceless "else" with braced "then",
+ // and short block last
+
+ if (expr)
+ x = y; // BAD: braceless "if" with braced "else"
+ else {
+ ...
+ ...
+ }
+
+Keeping braces consistent and putting the short block first is
+preferred, especially when the multi-line body is more than a few
+lines long, because it is easier to read and grasp the semantics
+of an if-then-else block when the simpler block occurs first,
+rather than after the more involved block:
+
+::
+
+ if (!expr) {
+ x = y; // putting the smaller block first is more readable
+ } else {
+ ...
+ ...
+ }
+
+But if negating a complex condition is too ugly, then at least add
+braces:
+
+::
+
+ if (complex expr not worth negating) {
+ ...
+ ...
+ } else {
+ x = y;
+ }
+
+Use hanging braces for compound statements: the opening brace of a
+compound statement should be on the same line as the condition
+being tested. Only top-level function bodies, nested scopes, and
+compound structure declarations should ever have { on a line by
+itself.
+
+::
+
+ void
+ foo(int a, int b)
+ { // correct - function body
+ int 2d[][] = {
+ { // correct - complex initialization
+ 1, 2,
+ },
+ };
+ if (a)
+ { // BAD: compound brace on its own line
+ do_stuff();
+ }
+ { // correct - nested scope
+ int tmp;
+ if (a < b) { // correct - hanging brace
+ tmp = b;
+ b = a;
+ a = tmp;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+Conditional expressions
+-----------------------
+
+For readability reasons new code should avoid shortening
+comparisons to 0 for numeric types. Boolean and pointer
+comparisions may be shortened. All long forms are okay:
+
+::
+
+ virFooPtr foos = NULL;
+ size nfoos = 0;
+ bool hasFoos = false;
+
+ GOOD:
+ if (!foos)
+ if (!hasFoos)
+ if (nfoos == 0)
+ if (foos == NULL)
+ if (hasFoos == true)
+
+ BAD:
+ if (!nfoos)
+ if (nfoos)
+
+New code should avoid the ternary operator as much as possible.
+Specifically it must never span more than one line or nest:
+
+::
+
+ BAD:
+ char *foo = baz ?
+ virDoSomethingReallyComplex(driver, vm, something, baz->foo) :
+ NULL;
+
+ char *foo = bar ? bar->baz ? bar->baz->foo : "nobaz" : "nobar";
+
+Preprocessor
+------------
+
+Macros defined with an ALL_CAPS name should generally be assumed
+to be unsafe with regards to arguments with side-effects (that is,
+MAX(a++, b--) might increment a or decrement b too many or too few
+times). Exceptions to this rule are explicitly documented for
+macros in viralloc.h and virstring.h.
+
+For variadic macros, stick with C99 syntax:
+
+::
+
+ #define vshPrint(_ctl, ...) fprintf(stdout, __VA_ARGS__)
+
+Use parenthesis when checking if a macro is defined, and use
+indentation to track nesting:
+
+::
+
+ #if defined(HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE) && !defined(HAVE_FALLOCATE)
+ # define fallocate(a, ignored, b, c) posix_fallocate(a, b, c)
+ #endif
+
+C types
+-------
+
+Use the right type.
+
+Scalars
+~~~~~~~
+
+- If you're using ``int`` or ``long``, odds are good that there's
+ a better type.
+- If a variable is counting something, be sure to declare it with
+ an unsigned type.
+- If it's memory-size-related, use ``size_t`` (use ``ssize_t``
+ only if required).
+- If it's file-size related, use uintmax_t, or maybe ``off_t``.
+- If it's file-offset related (i.e., signed), use ``off_t``.
+- If it's just counting small numbers use ``unsigned int``; (on
+ all but oddball embedded systems, you can assume that that type
+ is at least four bytes wide).
+- If a variable has boolean semantics, give it the ``bool`` type
+ and use the corresponding ``true`` and ``false`` macros.
+- In the unusual event that you require a specific width, use a
+ standard type like ``int32_t``, ``uint32_t``, ``uint64_t``,
+ etc.
+- While using ``bool`` is good for readability, it comes with
+ minor caveats:
+
+ - Don't use ``bool`` in places where the type size must be
+ constant across all systems, like public interfaces and
+ on-the-wire protocols. Note that it would be possible
+ (albeit wasteful) to use ``bool`` in libvirt's logical wire
+ protocol, since XDR maps that to its lower-level ``bool_t``
+ type, which **is** fixed-size.
+ - Don't compare a bool variable against the literal, ``true``,
+ since a value with a logical non-false value need not be
+ ``1``. I.e., don't write ``if (seen == true) ...``. Rather,
+ write ``if (seen)...``.
+
+Of course, take all of the above with a grain of salt. If you're
+about to use some system interface that requires a type like
+``size_t``, ``pid_t`` or ``off_t``, use matching types for any
+corresponding variables.
+
+Also, if you try to use e.g., ``unsigned int`` as a type, and that
+conflicts with the signedness of a related variable, sometimes
+it's best just to use the **wrong** type, if *pulling the thread*
+and fixing all related variables would be too invasive.
+
+Finally, while using descriptive types is important, be careful
+not to go overboard. If whatever you're doing causes warnings, or
+requires casts, then reconsider or ask for help.
+
+Pointers
+~~~~~~~~
+
+Ensure that all of your pointers are *const-correct*. Unless a
+pointer is used to modify the pointed-to storage, give it the
+``const`` attribute. That way, the reader knows up-front that this
+is a read-only pointer. Perhaps more importantly, if we're
+diligent about this, when you see a non-const pointer, you're
+guaranteed that it is used to modify the storage it points to, or
+it is aliased to another pointer that is.
+
+Attribute annotations
+---------------------
+
+Use the following annotations to help the compiler and/or static
+analysis tools understand the code better:
+
++-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
+| Macro | Meaning |
++===============================+============================================================+
+| ``ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL`` | passing NULL for this parameter is not allowed |
++-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
+| ``ATTRIBUTE_PACKED`` | force a structure to be packed |
++-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
+| ``G_GNUC_FALLTHROUGH`` | allow code reuse by multiple switch cases |
++-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
+| ``G_GNUC_NO_INLINE`` | the function is mocked in the test suite |
++-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
+| ``G_GNUC_NORETURN`` | the function never returns |
++-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
+| ``G_GNUC_NULL_TERMINATED`` | last parameter must be NULL |
++-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
+| ``G_GNUC_PRINTF`` | validate that the formatting string matches parameters |
++-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
+| ``G_GNUC_UNUSED`` | parameter is unused in this implementation of the function |
++-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
+| ``G_GNUC_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT`` | the return value must be checked |
++-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
+
+File handling
+-------------
+
+Usage of the ``fdopen()``, ``close()``, ``fclose()`` APIs is
+deprecated in libvirt code base to help avoiding double-closing of
+files or file descriptors, which is particularly dangerous in a
+multi-threaded application. Instead of these APIs, use the macros
+from virfile.h
+
+- Open a file from a file descriptor:
+
+ ::
+
+ if ((file = VIR_FDOPEN(fd, "r")) == NULL) {
+ virReportSystemError(errno, "%s",
+ _("failed to open file from file descriptor"));
+ return -1;
+ }
+ /* fd is now invalid; only access the file using file variable */
+
+- Close a file descriptor:
+
+ ::
+
+ if (VIR_CLOSE(fd) < 0) {
+ virReportSystemError(errno, "%s", _("failed to close file"));
+ }
+
+- Close a file:
+
+ ::
+
+ if (VIR_FCLOSE(file) < 0) {
+ virReportSystemError(errno, "%s", _("failed to close file"));
+ }
+
+- Close a file or file descriptor in an error path, without
+ losing the previous ``errno`` value:
+
+ ::
+
+ VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(fd);
+ VIR_FORCE_FCLOSE(file);
+
+String comparisons
+------------------
+
+Do not use the strcmp, strncmp, etc functions directly. Instead
+use one of the following semantically named macros
+
+- For strict equality:
+
+ ::
+
+ STREQ(a,b)
+ STRNEQ(a,b)
+
+- For case insensitive equality:
+
+ ::
+
+ STRCASEEQ(a,b)
+ STRCASENEQ(a,b)
+
+- For strict equality of a substring:
+
+ ::
+
+ STREQLEN(a,b,n)
+ STRNEQLEN(a,b,n)
+
+- For case insensitive equality of a substring:
+
+ ::
+
+ STRCASEEQLEN(a,b,n)
+ STRCASENEQLEN(a,b,n)
+
+- For strict equality of a prefix:
+
+ ::
+
+ STRPREFIX(a,b)
+
+- To avoid having to check if a or b are NULL:
+
+ ::
+
+ STREQ_NULLABLE(a, b)
+ STRNEQ_NULLABLE(a, b)
+
+String copying
+--------------
+
+Do not use the strncpy function. According to the man page, it
+does **not** guarantee a NULL-terminated buffer, which makes it
+extremely dangerous to use. Instead, use one of the replacement
+functions provided by libvirt:
+
+::
+
+ virStrncpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t n, size_t destbytes)
+
+The first two arguments have the same meaning as for strncpy,
+namely the destination and source of the copy operation. Unlike
+strncpy, the function will always copy exactly the number of bytes
+requested and make sure the destination is NULL-terminated, as the
+source is required to be; sanity checks are performed to ensure
+the size of the destination, as specified by the last argument, is
+sufficient for the operation to succeed. On success, 0 is
+returned; on failure, a value <0 is returned instead.
+
+::
+
+ virStrcpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t destbytes)
+
+Use this variant if you know you want to copy the entire src
+string into dest.
+
+::
+
+ virStrcpyStatic(char *dest, const char *src)
+
+Use this variant if you know you want to copy the entire src
+string into dest **and** you know that your destination string is
+a static string (i.e. that sizeof(dest) returns something
+meaningful). Note that this is a macro, so arguments could be
+evaluated more than once.
+
+::
+
+ dst = g_strdup(src);
+ dst = g_strndup(src, n);
+
+You should avoid using strdup or strndup directly as they do not
+handle out-of-memory errors, and do not allow a NULL source. Use
+``g_strdup`` and ``g_strndup`` from GLib which abort on OOM and
+handle NULL source by returning NULL.
+
+Variable length string buffer
+-----------------------------
+
+If there is a need for complex string concatenations, avoid using
+the usual sequence of malloc/strcpy/strcat/snprintf functions and
+make use of either the
+`GString <https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Strings.html>`__
+type from GLib or the virBuffer API. If formatting XML or QEMU
+command line is needed, use the virBuffer API described in
+virbuffer.h, since it has helper functions for those.
+
+Typical usage is as follows:
+
+::
+
+ char *
+ somefunction(...)
+ {
+ g_auto(virBuffer) buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER;
+
+ ...
+
+ virBufferAddLit(&buf, "<domain>\n");
+
+ ...
+
+ if (some_error)
+ return NULL; /* g_auto will free the memory used so far */
+
+ ...
+
+ virBufferAddLit(&buf, "</domain>\n");
+
+ ...
+
+ if (virBufferCheckError(&buf) < 0)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return virBufferContentAndReset(&buf);
+ }
+
+Include files
+-------------
+
+There are now quite a large number of include files, both libvirt
+internal and external, and system includes. To manage all this
+complexity it's best to stick to the following general plan for
+all \*.c source files:
+
+::
+
+ /*
+ * Copyright notice
+ * ....
+ * ....
+ * ....
+ *
+ */
+
+ #include <config.h> Must come first in every file.
+
+ #include <stdio.h> Any system includes you need.
+ #include <string.h>
+ #include <limits.h>
+
+ #if WITH_NUMACTL Some system includes aren't supported
+ # include <numa.h> everywhere so need these #if guards.
+ #endif
+
+ #include "internal.h" Include this first, after system includes.
+
+ #include "util.h" Any libvirt internal header files.
+ #include "buf.h"
+
+ static int
+ myInternalFunc() The actual code.
+ {
+ ...
+
+Of particular note: **Do not** include libvirt/libvirt.h,
+libvirt/virterror.h, libvirt/libvirt-qemu.h, or
+libvirt/libvirt-lxc.h. They are included by "internal.h" already
+and there are some special reasons why you cannot include these
+files explicitly. One of the special cases, "libvirt/libvirt.h" is
+included prior to "internal.h" in "remote_protocol.x", to avoid
+exposing \*_LAST enum elements.
+
+Printf-style functions
+----------------------
+
+Whenever you add a new printf-style function, i.e., one with a
+format string argument and following "..." in its prototype, be
+sure to use gcc's printf attribute directive in the prototype. For
+example, here's the one for virCommandAddEnvFormat in
+vircommand.h:
+
+::
+
+ void virCommandAddEnvFormat(virCommandPtr cmd, const char *format, ...)
+ G_GNUC_PRINTF(2, 3);
+
+This makes it so gcc's -Wformat and -Wformat-security options can
+do their jobs and cross-check format strings with the number and
+types of arguments.
+
+When printing to a string, consider using GString or virBuffer for
+incremental allocations, g_strdup_printf for a one-shot
+allocation, and g_snprintf for fixed-width buffers. Only use
+g_sprintf, if you can prove the buffer won't overflow.
+
+Error message format
+--------------------
+
+Error messages visible to the user should be short and
+descriptive. All error messages are translated using gettext and
+thus must be wrapped in ``_()`` macro. To simplify the translation
+work, the error message must not be concatenated from various
+parts. To simplify searching for the error message in the code the
+strings should not be broken even if they result into a line
+longer than 80 columns and any formatting modifier should be
+enclosed by quotes or other obvious separator. If a string used
+with ``%s`` can be NULL the NULLSTR macro must be used.
+
+::
+
+ GOOD: virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
+ _("Failed to connect to remote host '%s'"), hostname)
+
+ BAD: virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
+ _("Failed to %s to remote host '%s'"),
+ "connect", hostname);
+
+ BAD: virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
+ _("Failed to connect "
+ "to remote host '%s'),
+ hostname);
+
+Use of goto
+-----------
+
+The use of goto is not forbidden, and goto is widely used
+throughout libvirt. While the uncontrolled use of goto will
+quickly lead to unmaintainable code, there is a place for it in
+well structured code where its use increases readability and
+maintainability. In general, if goto is used for error recovery,
+it's likely to be ok, otherwise, be cautious or avoid it all
+together.
+
+The typical use of goto is to jump to cleanup code in the case of
+a long list of actions, any of which may fail and cause the entire
+operation to fail. In this case, a function will have a single
+label at the end of the function. It's almost always ok to use
+this style. In particular, if the cleanup code only involves
+free'ing memory, then having multiple labels is overkill. g_free()
+and most of the functions named XXXFree() in libvirt is required
+to handle NULL as its arg. This does not apply to libvirt's public
+APIs. Thus you can safely call free on all the variables even if
+they were not yet allocated (yes they have to have been
+initialized to NULL). This is much simpler and clearer than having
+multiple labels. Note that most of libvirt's type declarations can
+be marked with either ``g_autofree`` or ``g_autoptr`` which uses
+the compiler's ``__attribute__((cleanup))`` that calls the
+appropriate free function when the variable goes out of scope.
+
+There are a couple of signs that a particular use of goto is not
+ok:
+
+- You're using multiple labels. If you find yourself using
+ multiple labels, you're strongly encouraged to rework your code
+ to eliminate all but one of them.
+- The goto jumps back up to a point above the current line of
+ code being executed. Please use some combination of looping
+ constructs to re-execute code instead; it's almost certainly
+ going to be more understandable by others. One well-known
+ exception to this rule is restarting an i/o operation following
+ EINTR.
+- The goto jumps down to an arbitrary place in the middle of a
+ function followed by further potentially failing calls. You
+ should almost certainly be using a conditional and a block
+ instead of a goto. Perhaps some of your function's logic would
+ be better pulled out into a helper function.
+
+Although libvirt does not encourage the Linux kernel wind/unwind
+style of multiple labels, there's a good general discussion of the
+issue archived at
+`KernelTrap <http://kerneltrap.org/node/553/2131>`__
+
+When using goto, please use one of these standard labels if it
+makes sense:
+
+::
+
+ error: A path only taken upon return with an error code
+ cleanup: A path taken upon return with success code + optional error
+ no_memory: A path only taken upon return with an OOM error code
+ retry: If needing to jump upwards (e.g., retry on EINTR)
+
+Top-level labels should be indented by one space (putting them on
+the beginning of the line confuses function context detection in
+git):
+
+::
+
+ int foo()
+ {
+ /* ... do stuff ... */
+ cleanup:
+ /* ... do other stuff ... */
+ }
- `YouCompleteMe <http://valloric.github.io/YouCompleteMe/>`__, a
vim plugin for libclang-powered semantic code completion.
-Naming conventions
-==================
-
-When reading libvirt code, a number of different naming
-conventions will be evident due to various changes in thinking
-over the course of the project's lifetime. The conventions
-documented below should be followed when creating any entirely new
-files in libvirt. When working on existing files, while it is
-desirable to apply these conventions, keeping a consistent style
-with existing code in that particular file is generally more
-important. The overall guiding principal is that every file, enum,
-struct, function, macro and typedef name must have a 'vir' or
-'VIR' prefix. All local scope variable names are exempt, and
-global variables are exempt, unless exported in a header file.
-
-File names
- File naming varies depending on the subdirectory. The preferred
- style is to have a 'vir' prefix, followed by a name which
- matches the name of the functions / objects inside the file.
- For example, a file containing an object 'virHashtable' is
- stored in files 'virhashtable.c' and 'virhashtable.h'.
- Sometimes, methods which would otherwise be declared 'static'
- need to be exported for use by a test suite. For this purpose a
- second header file should be added with a suffix of 'priv',
- e.g. 'virhashtablepriv.h'. Use of underscores in file names is
- discouraged when using the 'vir' prefix style. The 'vir' prefix
- naming applies to src/util, src/rpc and tests/ directories.
- Most other directories do not follow this convention.
-
-Enum type & field names
- All enums should have a 'vir' prefix in their typedef name, and
- each following word should have its first letter in uppercase.
- The enum name should match the typedef name with a leading
- underscore. The enum member names should be in all uppercase,
- and use an underscore to separate each word. The enum member
- name prefix should match the enum typedef name.
-
- ::
-
- typedef enum _virSocketType virSocketType;
- enum _virSocketType {
- VIR_SOCKET_TYPE_IPV4,
- VIR_SOCKET_TYPE_IPV6,
- };
-
-Struct type names
- All structs should have a 'vir' prefix in their typedef name,
- and each following word should have its first letter in
- uppercase. The struct name should be the same as the typedef
- name with a leading underscore. A second typedef should be
- given for a pointer to the struct with a 'Ptr' suffix.
-
- ::
-
- typedef struct _virHashTable virHashTable;
- typedef virHashTable *virHashTablePtr;
- struct _virHashTable {
- ...
- };
-
-Function names
- All functions should have a 'vir' prefix in their name,
- followed by one or more words with first letter of each word
- capitalized. Underscores should not be used in function names.
- If the function is operating on an object, then the function
- name prefix should match the object typedef name, otherwise it
- should match the filename. Following this comes the verb /
- action name, and finally an optional subject name. For example,
- given an object 'virHashTable', all functions should have a
- name 'virHashTable$VERB' or 'virHashTable$VERB$SUBJECT", e.g.
- 'virHashTableLookup' or 'virHashTableGetValue'.
-
-Macro names
- All macros should have a "VIR" prefix in their name, followed
- by one or more uppercase words separated by underscores. The
- macro argument names should be in lowercase. Aside from having
- a "VIR" prefix there are no common practices for the rest of
- the macro name.
-
-Code indentation
-================
-
-Libvirt's C source code generally adheres to some basic
-code-formatting conventions. The existing code base is not totally
-consistent on this front, but we do prefer that contributed code
-be formatted similarly. In short, use spaces-not-TABs for
-indentation, use 4 spaces for each indentation level, and other
-than that, follow the K&R style.
-
-If you use Emacs, the project includes a file .dir-locals.el that
-sets up the preferred indentation. If you use vim, append the
-following to your ~/.vimrc file:
-
-::
-
- set nocompatible
- filetype on
- set autoindent
- set smartindent
- set cindent
- set tabstop=8
- set shiftwidth=4
- set expandtab
- set cinoptions=(0,:0,l1,t0,L3
- filetype plugin indent on
- au FileType make setlocal noexpandtab
- au BufRead,BufNewFile *.am setlocal noexpandtab
- match ErrorMsg /\s\+$\| \+\ze\t/
-
-Or if you don't want to mess your ~/.vimrc up, you can save the
-above into a file called .lvimrc (not .vimrc) located at the root
-of libvirt source, then install a vim script from
-http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1408, which will
-load the .lvimrc only when you edit libvirt code.
-
-Code formatting (especially for new code)
-=========================================
-
-With new code, we can be even more strict. Please apply the
-following function (using GNU indent) to any new code. Note that
-this also gives you an idea of the type of spacing we prefer
-around operators and keywords:
-
-::
-
- indent-libvirt()
- {
- indent -bad -bap -bbb -bli4 -br -ce -brs -cs -i4 -l75 -lc75 \
- -sbi4 -psl -saf -sai -saw -sbi4 -ss -sc -cdw -cli4 -npcs -nbc \
- --no-tabs "$@"
- }
-
-Note that sometimes you'll have to post-process that output
-further, by piping it through ``expand -i``, since some leading
-TABs can get through. Usually they're in macro definitions or
-strings, and should be converted anyhow.
-
-Libvirt requires a C99 compiler for various reasons. However, most
-of the code base prefers to stick to C89 syntax unless there is a
-compelling reason otherwise. For example, it is preferable to use
-``/* */`` comments rather than ``//``. Also, when declaring local
-variables, the prevailing style has been to declare them at the
-beginning of a scope, rather than immediately before use.
-
-Bracket spacing
----------------
-
-The keywords ``if``, ``for``, ``while``, and ``switch`` must have
-a single space following them before the opening bracket. E.g.
-
-::
-
- if(foo) // Bad
- if (foo) // Good
-
-Function implementations must **not** have any whitespace between
-the function name and the opening bracket. E.g.
-
-::
-
- int foo (int wizz) // Bad
- int foo(int wizz) // Good
-
-Function calls must **not** have any whitespace between the
-function name and the opening bracket. E.g.
-
-::
-
- bar = foo (wizz); // Bad
- bar = foo(wizz); // Good
-
-Function typedefs must **not** have any whitespace between the
-closing bracket of the function name and opening bracket of the
-arg list. E.g.
-
-::
-
- typedef int (*foo) (int wizz); // Bad
- typedef int (*foo)(int wizz); // Good
-
-There must not be any whitespace immediately following any opening
-bracket, or immediately prior to any closing bracket. E.g.
-
-::
-
- int foo( int wizz ); // Bad
- int foo(int wizz); // Good
-
-Commas
-------
-
-Commas should always be followed by a space or end of line, and
-never have leading space; this is enforced during 'make
-syntax-check'.
-
-::
-
- call(a,b ,c);// Bad
- call(a, b, c); // Good
-
-When declaring an enum or using a struct initializer that occupies
-more than one line, use a trailing comma. That way, future edits
-to extend the list only have to add a line, rather than modify an
-existing line to add the intermediate comma. Any sentinel
-enumerator value with a name ending in \_LAST is exempt, since you
-would extend such an enum before the \_LAST element. Another
-reason to favor trailing commas is that it requires less effort to
-produce via code generators. Note that the syntax checker is
-unable to enforce a style of trailing commas, so there are
-counterexamples in existing code which do not use it; also, while
-C99 allows trailing commas, remember that JSON and XDR do not.
-
-::
-
- enum {
- VALUE_ONE,
- VALUE_TWO // Bad
- };
- enum {
- VALUE_THREE,
- VALUE_FOUR, // Good
- };
-
-Semicolons
-----------
-
-Semicolons should never have a space beforehand. Inside the
-condition of a ``for`` loop, there should always be a space or
-line break after each semicolon, except for the special case of an
-infinite loop (although more infinite loops use ``while``). While
-not enforced, loop counters generally use post-increment.
-
-::
-
- for (i = 0 ;i < limit ; ++i) { // Bad
- for (i = 0; i < limit; i++) { // Good
- for (;;) { // ok
- while (1) { // Better
-
-Empty loop bodies are better represented with curly braces and a
-comment, although use of a semicolon is not currently rejected.
-
-::
-
- while ((rc = waitpid(pid, &st, 0) == -1) &&
- errno == EINTR); // ok
- while ((rc = waitpid(pid, &st, 0) == -1) &&
- errno == EINTR) { // Better
- /* nothing */
- }
-
-Curly braces
-------------
-
-Omit the curly braces around an ``if``, ``while``, ``for`` etc.
-body only when both that body and the condition itself occupy a
-single line. In every other case we require the braces. This
-ensures that it is trivially easy to identify a
-single-\ *statement* loop: each has only one *line* in its body.
-
-::
-
- while (expr) // single line body; {} is forbidden
- single_line_stmt();
-
-::
-
- while (expr(arg1,
- arg2)) // indentation makes it obvious it is single line,
- single_line_stmt(); // {} is optional (not enforced either way)
-
-::
-
- while (expr1 &&
- expr2) { // multi-line, at same indentation, {} required
- single_line_stmt();
- }
-
-However, the moment your loop/if/else body extends on to a second
-line, for whatever reason (even if it's just an added comment),
-then you should add braces. Otherwise, it would be too easy to
-insert a statement just before that comment (without adding
-braces), thinking it is already a multi-statement loop:
-
-::
-
- while (true) // BAD! multi-line body with no braces
- /* comment... */
- single_line_stmt();
-
-Do this instead:
-
-::
-
- while (true) { // Always put braces around a multi-line body.
- /* comment... */
- single_line_stmt();
- }
-
-There is one exception: when the second body line is not at the
-same indentation level as the first body line:
-
-::
-
- if (expr)
- die("a diagnostic that would make this line"
- " extend past the 80-column limit"));
-
-It is safe to omit the braces in the code above, since the
-further-indented second body line makes it obvious that this is
-still a single-statement body.
-
-To reiterate, don't do this:
-
-::
-
- if (expr) // BAD: no braces around...
- while (expr_2) { // ... a multi-line body
- ...
- }
-
-Do this, instead:
-
-::
-
- if (expr) {
- while (expr_2) {
- ...
- }
- }
-
-However, there is one exception in the other direction, when even
-a one-line block should have braces. That occurs when that
-one-line, brace-less block is an ``if`` or ``else`` block, and the
-counterpart block **does** use braces. In that case, put braces
-around both blocks. Also, if the ``else`` block is much shorter
-than the ``if`` block, consider negating the ``if``-condition and
-swapping the bodies, putting the short block first and making the
-longer, multi-line block be the ``else`` block.
-
-::
-
- if (expr) {
- ...
- ...
- }
- else
- x = y; // BAD: braceless "else" with braced "then",
- // and short block last
-
- if (expr)
- x = y; // BAD: braceless "if" with braced "else"
- else {
- ...
- ...
- }
-
-Keeping braces consistent and putting the short block first is
-preferred, especially when the multi-line body is more than a few
-lines long, because it is easier to read and grasp the semantics
-of an if-then-else block when the simpler block occurs first,
-rather than after the more involved block:
-
-::
-
- if (!expr) {
- x = y; // putting the smaller block first is more readable
- } else {
- ...
- ...
- }
-
-But if negating a complex condition is too ugly, then at least add
-braces:
-
-::
-
- if (complex expr not worth negating) {
- ...
- ...
- } else {
- x = y;
- }
-
-Use hanging braces for compound statements: the opening brace of a
-compound statement should be on the same line as the condition
-being tested. Only top-level function bodies, nested scopes, and
-compound structure declarations should ever have { on a line by
-itself.
-
-::
-
- void
- foo(int a, int b)
- { // correct - function body
- int 2d[][] = {
- { // correct - complex initialization
- 1, 2,
- },
- };
- if (a)
- { // BAD: compound brace on its own line
- do_stuff();
- }
- { // correct - nested scope
- int tmp;
- if (a < b) { // correct - hanging brace
- tmp = b;
- b = a;
- a = tmp;
- }
- }
- }
-
-Conditional expressions
------------------------
-
-For readability reasons new code should avoid shortening
-comparisons to 0 for numeric types. Boolean and pointer
-comparisions may be shortened. All long forms are okay:
-
-::
-
- virFooPtr foos = NULL;
- size nfoos = 0;
- bool hasFoos = false;
-
- GOOD:
- if (!foos)
- if (!hasFoos)
- if (nfoos == 0)
- if (foos == NULL)
- if (hasFoos == true)
-
- BAD:
- if (!nfoos)
- if (nfoos)
-
-New code should avoid the ternary operator as much as possible.
-Specifically it must never span more than one line or nest:
-
-::
-
- BAD:
- char *foo = baz ?
- virDoSomethingReallyComplex(driver, vm, something, baz->foo) :
- NULL;
-
- char *foo = bar ? bar->baz ? bar->baz->foo : "nobaz" : "nobar";
-
-Preprocessor
-------------
-
-Macros defined with an ALL_CAPS name should generally be assumed
-to be unsafe with regards to arguments with side-effects (that is,
-MAX(a++, b--) might increment a or decrement b too many or too few
-times). Exceptions to this rule are explicitly documented for
-macros in viralloc.h and virstring.h.
-
-For variadic macros, stick with C99 syntax:
-
-::
-
- #define vshPrint(_ctl, ...) fprintf(stdout, __VA_ARGS__)
-
-Use parenthesis when checking if a macro is defined, and use
-indentation to track nesting:
-
-::
-
- #if defined(HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE) && !defined(HAVE_FALLOCATE)
- # define fallocate(a, ignored, b, c) posix_fallocate(a, b, c)
- #endif
-
-C types
--------
-
-Use the right type.
-
-Scalars
-~~~~~~~
-
-- If you're using ``int`` or ``long``, odds are good that there's
- a better type.
-- If a variable is counting something, be sure to declare it with
- an unsigned type.
-- If it's memory-size-related, use ``size_t`` (use ``ssize_t``
- only if required).
-- If it's file-size related, use uintmax_t, or maybe ``off_t``.
-- If it's file-offset related (i.e., signed), use ``off_t``.
-- If it's just counting small numbers use ``unsigned int``; (on
- all but oddball embedded systems, you can assume that that type
- is at least four bytes wide).
-- If a variable has boolean semantics, give it the ``bool`` type
- and use the corresponding ``true`` and ``false`` macros.
-- In the unusual event that you require a specific width, use a
- standard type like ``int32_t``, ``uint32_t``, ``uint64_t``,
- etc.
-- While using ``bool`` is good for readability, it comes with
- minor caveats:
-
- - Don't use ``bool`` in places where the type size must be
- constant across all systems, like public interfaces and
- on-the-wire protocols. Note that it would be possible
- (albeit wasteful) to use ``bool`` in libvirt's logical wire
- protocol, since XDR maps that to its lower-level ``bool_t``
- type, which **is** fixed-size.
- - Don't compare a bool variable against the literal, ``true``,
- since a value with a logical non-false value need not be
- ``1``. I.e., don't write ``if (seen == true) ...``. Rather,
- write ``if (seen)...``.
-
-Of course, take all of the above with a grain of salt. If you're
-about to use some system interface that requires a type like
-``size_t``, ``pid_t`` or ``off_t``, use matching types for any
-corresponding variables.
-
-Also, if you try to use e.g., ``unsigned int`` as a type, and that
-conflicts with the signedness of a related variable, sometimes
-it's best just to use the **wrong** type, if *pulling the thread*
-and fixing all related variables would be too invasive.
-
-Finally, while using descriptive types is important, be careful
-not to go overboard. If whatever you're doing causes warnings, or
-requires casts, then reconsider or ask for help.
-
-Pointers
-~~~~~~~~
-
-Ensure that all of your pointers are *const-correct*. Unless a
-pointer is used to modify the pointed-to storage, give it the
-``const`` attribute. That way, the reader knows up-front that this
-is a read-only pointer. Perhaps more importantly, if we're
-diligent about this, when you see a non-const pointer, you're
-guaranteed that it is used to modify the storage it points to, or
-it is aliased to another pointer that is.
-
-Attribute annotations
----------------------
-
-Use the following annotations to help the compiler and/or static
-analysis tools understand the code better:
-
-+-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
-| Macro | Meaning |
-+===============================+============================================================+
-| ``ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL`` | passing NULL for this parameter is not allowed |
-+-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
-| ``ATTRIBUTE_PACKED`` | force a structure to be packed |
-+-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
-| ``G_GNUC_FALLTHROUGH`` | allow code reuse by multiple switch cases |
-+-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
-| ``G_GNUC_NO_INLINE`` | the function is mocked in the test suite |
-+-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
-| ``G_GNUC_NORETURN`` | the function never returns |
-+-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
-| ``G_GNUC_NULL_TERMINATED`` | last parameter must be NULL |
-+-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
-| ``G_GNUC_PRINTF`` | validate that the formatting string matches parameters |
-+-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
-| ``G_GNUC_UNUSED`` | parameter is unused in this implementation of the function |
-+-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
-| ``G_GNUC_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT`` | the return value must be checked |
-+-------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+
-
-File handling
--------------
-
-Usage of the ``fdopen()``, ``close()``, ``fclose()`` APIs is
-deprecated in libvirt code base to help avoiding double-closing of
-files or file descriptors, which is particularly dangerous in a
-multi-threaded application. Instead of these APIs, use the macros
-from virfile.h
-
-- Open a file from a file descriptor:
-
- ::
-
- if ((file = VIR_FDOPEN(fd, "r")) == NULL) {
- virReportSystemError(errno, "%s",
- _("failed to open file from file descriptor"));
- return -1;
- }
- /* fd is now invalid; only access the file using file variable */
-
-- Close a file descriptor:
-
- ::
-
- if (VIR_CLOSE(fd) < 0) {
- virReportSystemError(errno, "%s", _("failed to close file"));
- }
-
-- Close a file:
-
- ::
-
- if (VIR_FCLOSE(file) < 0) {
- virReportSystemError(errno, "%s", _("failed to close file"));
- }
-
-- Close a file or file descriptor in an error path, without
- losing the previous ``errno`` value:
-
- ::
-
- VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(fd);
- VIR_FORCE_FCLOSE(file);
-
-String comparisons
-------------------
-
-Do not use the strcmp, strncmp, etc functions directly. Instead
-use one of the following semantically named macros
-
-- For strict equality:
-
- ::
-
- STREQ(a,b)
- STRNEQ(a,b)
-
-- For case insensitive equality:
-
- ::
-
- STRCASEEQ(a,b)
- STRCASENEQ(a,b)
-
-- For strict equality of a substring:
-
- ::
-
- STREQLEN(a,b,n)
- STRNEQLEN(a,b,n)
-
-- For case insensitive equality of a substring:
-
- ::
-
- STRCASEEQLEN(a,b,n)
- STRCASENEQLEN(a,b,n)
-
-- For strict equality of a prefix:
-
- ::
-
- STRPREFIX(a,b)
-
-- To avoid having to check if a or b are NULL:
-
- ::
-
- STREQ_NULLABLE(a, b)
- STRNEQ_NULLABLE(a, b)
-
-String copying
---------------
-
-Do not use the strncpy function. According to the man page, it
-does **not** guarantee a NULL-terminated buffer, which makes it
-extremely dangerous to use. Instead, use one of the replacement
-functions provided by libvirt:
-
-::
-
- virStrncpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t n, size_t destbytes)
-
-The first two arguments have the same meaning as for strncpy,
-namely the destination and source of the copy operation. Unlike
-strncpy, the function will always copy exactly the number of bytes
-requested and make sure the destination is NULL-terminated, as the
-source is required to be; sanity checks are performed to ensure
-the size of the destination, as specified by the last argument, is
-sufficient for the operation to succeed. On success, 0 is
-returned; on failure, a value <0 is returned instead.
-
-::
-
- virStrcpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t destbytes)
-
-Use this variant if you know you want to copy the entire src
-string into dest.
-
-::
-
- virStrcpyStatic(char *dest, const char *src)
-
-Use this variant if you know you want to copy the entire src
-string into dest **and** you know that your destination string is
-a static string (i.e. that sizeof(dest) returns something
-meaningful). Note that this is a macro, so arguments could be
-evaluated more than once.
-
-::
-
- dst = g_strdup(src);
- dst = g_strndup(src, n);
-
-You should avoid using strdup or strndup directly as they do not
-handle out-of-memory errors, and do not allow a NULL source. Use
-``g_strdup`` and ``g_strndup`` from GLib which abort on OOM and
-handle NULL source by returning NULL.
-
-Variable length string buffer
------------------------------
-
-If there is a need for complex string concatenations, avoid using
-the usual sequence of malloc/strcpy/strcat/snprintf functions and
-make use of either the
-`GString <https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Strings.html>`__
-type from GLib or the virBuffer API. If formatting XML or QEMU
-command line is needed, use the virBuffer API described in
-virbuffer.h, since it has helper functions for those.
-
-Typical usage is as follows:
-
-::
-
- char *
- somefunction(...)
- {
- g_auto(virBuffer) buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER;
-
- ...
-
- virBufferAddLit(&buf, "<domain>\n");
-
- ...
-
- if (some_error)
- return NULL; /* g_auto will free the memory used so far */
-
- ...
-
- virBufferAddLit(&buf, "</domain>\n");
-
- ...
-
- if (virBufferCheckError(&buf) < 0)
- return NULL;
-
- return virBufferContentAndReset(&buf);
- }
-
-Include files
--------------
-
-There are now quite a large number of include files, both libvirt
-internal and external, and system includes. To manage all this
-complexity it's best to stick to the following general plan for
-all \*.c source files:
-
-::
-
- /*
- * Copyright notice
- * ....
- * ....
- * ....
- *
- */
-
- #include <config.h> Must come first in every file.
-
- #include <stdio.h> Any system includes you need.
- #include <string.h>
- #include <limits.h>
-
- #if WITH_NUMACTL Some system includes aren't supported
- # include <numa.h> everywhere so need these #if guards.
- #endif
-
- #include "internal.h" Include this first, after system includes.
-
- #include "util.h" Any libvirt internal header files.
- #include "buf.h"
-
- static int
- myInternalFunc() The actual code.
- {
- ...
-
-Of particular note: **Do not** include libvirt/libvirt.h,
-libvirt/virterror.h, libvirt/libvirt-qemu.h, or
-libvirt/libvirt-lxc.h. They are included by "internal.h" already
-and there are some special reasons why you cannot include these
-files explicitly. One of the special cases, "libvirt/libvirt.h" is
-included prior to "internal.h" in "remote_protocol.x", to avoid
-exposing \*_LAST enum elements.
-
-Printf-style functions
-----------------------
-
-Whenever you add a new printf-style function, i.e., one with a
-format string argument and following "..." in its prototype, be
-sure to use gcc's printf attribute directive in the prototype. For
-example, here's the one for virCommandAddEnvFormat in
-vircommand.h:
-
-::
-
- void virCommandAddEnvFormat(virCommandPtr cmd, const char *format, ...)
- G_GNUC_PRINTF(2, 3);
-
-This makes it so gcc's -Wformat and -Wformat-security options can
-do their jobs and cross-check format strings with the number and
-types of arguments.
-
-When printing to a string, consider using GString or virBuffer for
-incremental allocations, g_strdup_printf for a one-shot
-allocation, and g_snprintf for fixed-width buffers. Only use
-g_sprintf, if you can prove the buffer won't overflow.
-
-Error message format
---------------------
-
-Error messages visible to the user should be short and
-descriptive. All error messages are translated using gettext and
-thus must be wrapped in ``_()`` macro. To simplify the translation
-work, the error message must not be concatenated from various
-parts. To simplify searching for the error message in the code the
-strings should not be broken even if they result into a line
-longer than 80 columns and any formatting modifier should be
-enclosed by quotes or other obvious separator. If a string used
-with ``%s`` can be NULL the NULLSTR macro must be used.
-
-::
-
- GOOD: virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
- _("Failed to connect to remote host '%s'"), hostname)
-
- BAD: virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
- _("Failed to %s to remote host '%s'"),
- "connect", hostname);
-
- BAD: virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
- _("Failed to connect "
- "to remote host '%s'),
- hostname);
-
-Use of goto
------------
-
-The use of goto is not forbidden, and goto is widely used
-throughout libvirt. While the uncontrolled use of goto will
-quickly lead to unmaintainable code, there is a place for it in
-well structured code where its use increases readability and
-maintainability. In general, if goto is used for error recovery,
-it's likely to be ok, otherwise, be cautious or avoid it all
-together.
-
-The typical use of goto is to jump to cleanup code in the case of
-a long list of actions, any of which may fail and cause the entire
-operation to fail. In this case, a function will have a single
-label at the end of the function. It's almost always ok to use
-this style. In particular, if the cleanup code only involves
-free'ing memory, then having multiple labels is overkill. g_free()
-and most of the functions named XXXFree() in libvirt is required
-to handle NULL as its arg. This does not apply to libvirt's public
-APIs. Thus you can safely call free on all the variables even if
-they were not yet allocated (yes they have to have been
-initialized to NULL). This is much simpler and clearer than having
-multiple labels. Note that most of libvirt's type declarations can
-be marked with either ``g_autofree`` or ``g_autoptr`` which uses
-the compiler's ``__attribute__((cleanup))`` that calls the
-appropriate free function when the variable goes out of scope.
-
-There are a couple of signs that a particular use of goto is not
-ok:
-
-- You're using multiple labels. If you find yourself using
- multiple labels, you're strongly encouraged to rework your code
- to eliminate all but one of them.
-- The goto jumps back up to a point above the current line of
- code being executed. Please use some combination of looping
- constructs to re-execute code instead; it's almost certainly
- going to be more understandable by others. One well-known
- exception to this rule is restarting an i/o operation following
- EINTR.
-- The goto jumps down to an arbitrary place in the middle of a
- function followed by further potentially failing calls. You
- should almost certainly be using a conditional and a block
- instead of a goto. Perhaps some of your function's logic would
- be better pulled out into a helper function.
-
-Although libvirt does not encourage the Linux kernel wind/unwind
-style of multiple labels, there's a good general discussion of the
-issue archived at
-`KernelTrap <http://kerneltrap.org/node/553/2131>`__
-
-When using goto, please use one of these standard labels if it
-makes sense:
-
-::
-
- error: A path only taken upon return with an error code
- cleanup: A path taken upon return with success code + optional error
- no_memory: A path only taken upon return with an OOM error code
- retry: If needing to jump upwards (e.g., retry on EINTR)
-
-Top-level labels should be indented by one space (putting them on
-the beginning of the line confuses function context detection in
-git):
-
-::
-
- int foo()
- {
- /* ... do stuff ... */
- cleanup:
- /* ... do other stuff ... */
- }
-
Libvirt committer guidelines
============================