tdb: Fix code spelling

Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>

diff --git a/lib/tdb/common/hash.c b/lib/tdb/common/hash.c
index 4de7ba94d2c231dc2c3a7baa8d23be1c55ded194..ca4cac3ab977b997471e2a87288954f318590708 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/tdb/common/hash.c
+++ b/lib/tdb/common/hash.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ if SELF_TEST is defined.  You can use this free for any purpose.  It's in
 the public domain.  It has no warranty.
 
 You probably want to use hashlittle().  hashlittle() and hashbig()
-hash byte arrays.  hashlittle() is is faster than hashbig() on
+hash byte arrays.  hashlittle() is faster than hashbig() on
 little-endian machines.  Intel and AMD are little-endian machines.
 On second thought, you probably want hashlittle2(), which is identical to
 hashlittle() except it returns two 32-bit hashes for the price of one.