Using the inline lock is now the recommended way for dma_fence
implementations.
So use this approach for the framework's internal fences as well.
Also saves about 4 bytes for the external spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260219160822.1529-8-christian.koenig@amd.com
array->num_fences = num_fences;
- spin_lock_init(&array->lock);
- dma_fence_init(&array->base, &dma_fence_array_ops, &array->lock,
- context, seqno);
+ dma_fence_init(&array->base, &dma_fence_array_ops, NULL, context,
+ seqno);
init_irq_work(&array->work, irq_dma_fence_array_work);
atomic_set(&array->num_pending, signal_on_any ? 1 : num_fences);
struct dma_fence_array {
struct dma_fence base;
- spinlock_t lock;
unsigned num_fences;
atomic_t num_pending;
struct dma_fence **fences;