Combining multiple corner-cases here:
* Insert a rule before another new one which is not the first. Triggers
NFTNL_RULE_ID assignment of the latter.
* Delete the referenced new rule in the same batch again. Causes
overwriting of the previously assigned RULE_ID.
Consequently, iptables-nft-restore fails during *insert*, because the
reference is dangling.
Reported-by: Eric Garver <eric@garver.life>
Fixes: 760b35b46e4cc ("nft: Fix for add and delete of same rule in single batch")
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Tested-by: Eric Garver <eric@garver.life>
nftnl_rule_list_del(r);
- if (!nftnl_rule_get_u64(r, NFTNL_RULE_HANDLE))
+ if (!nftnl_rule_get_u64(r, NFTNL_RULE_HANDLE) &&
+ !nftnl_rule_get_u32(r, NFTNL_RULE_ID))
nftnl_rule_set_u32(r, NFTNL_RULE_ID, ++h->rule_id);
obj = batch_rule_add(h, NFT_COMPAT_RULE_DELETE, r);
-A FORWARD -m comment --comment "rule 3" -j ACCEPT'
diff -u -Z <(echo -e "$EXPECT") <(ipt_show)
+
+# test adding, referencing and deleting the same rule in a batch
+
+$XT_MULTI iptables-restore <<EOF
+*filter
+-A FORWARD -m comment --comment "first rule" -j ACCEPT
+-A FORWARD -m comment --comment "referenced rule" -j ACCEPT
+-I FORWARD 2 -m comment --comment "referencing rule" -j ACCEPT
+-D FORWARD -m comment --comment "referenced rule" -j ACCEPT
+COMMIT
+EOF
+
+EXPECT='-A FORWARD -m comment --comment "first rule" -j ACCEPT
+-A FORWARD -m comment --comment "referencing rule" -j ACCEPT'
+
+diff -u -Z <(echo -e "$EXPECT") <(ipt_show)