commit
21a1416a1c945c5aeaeaf791b63c64926018eb77 upstream.
As pointed out by Jason Baron, when assigning a device to a guest
we first set the iommu domain pointer, which enables mapping
and unmapping of memory slots to the iommu. This leaves a window
where this path is enabled, but we haven't synchronized the iommu
mappings to the existing memory slots. Thus a slot being removed
at that point could send us down unexpected code paths removing
non-existent pinnings and iommu mappings. Take the slots_lock
around creating the iommu domain and initial mappings as well as
around iommu teardown to avoid this race.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
[PG: drop goto for EPERM check, 2.6.34 doesn't have that code]
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
return -ENODEV;
}
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
+
kvm->arch.iommu_domain = iommu_domain_alloc();
- if (!kvm->arch.iommu_domain)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!kvm->arch.iommu_domain) {
+ r = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
r = kvm_iommu_map_memslots(kvm);
if (r)
- goto out_unmap;
-
- return 0;
+ kvm_iommu_unmap_memslots(kvm);
-out_unmap:
- kvm_iommu_unmap_memslots(kvm);
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
return r;
}
if (!domain)
return 0;
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
kvm_iommu_unmap_memslots(kvm);
+ kvm->arch.iommu_domain = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
+
iommu_domain_free(domain);
return 0;
}