rcu_derefence_raw() should not have been used here, it concealed this bug.
Its used because struct rb_node lacks __rcu annotated pointers, so plain
rcu_derefence causes sparse warnings.
The major tradeoff is that rcu_derefence_raw() doesn't warn when the caller
isn't in a rcu read section.
Extend the rcu read lock scope accordingly and cause sparse warnings,
those warnings are the lesser evil.
Fixes: 11efd5cb04a1 ("openvswitch: Support conntrack zone limit")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603230610.7900-1-fw%40strlen.de
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
hash = jhash2(key, data->keylen, data->initval) % CONNCOUNT_SLOTS;
root = &data->root[hash];
- parent = rcu_dereference_raw(root->rb_node);
+ parent = rcu_dereference(root->rb_node);
while (parent) {
int diff;
diff = key_diff(key, rbconn->key, data->keylen);
if (diff < 0) {
- parent = rcu_dereference_raw(parent->rb_left);
+ parent = rcu_dereference(parent->rb_left);
} else if (diff > 0) {
- parent = rcu_dereference_raw(parent->rb_right);
+ parent = rcu_dereference(parent->rb_right);
} else {
int ret;
} else {
rcu_read_lock();
limit = ct_limit_get(info, zone);
- rcu_read_unlock();
err = __ovs_ct_limit_get_zone_limit(
net, info->data, zone, limit, reply);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (err)
return err;
}