strut intel_fb_pin_params will be an important part of the fb_pin
interface, so move the definition to the parent interface file.
Or maybe we should have a separate header for this kind of stuff
since the users of the parent interface will need the struct
definition but not the parent interface vfunc struct definitions?
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260508143426.26504-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
struct drm_gem_object;
struct i915_vma;
+struct intel_fb_pin_params;
struct intel_plane_state;
struct i915_gtt_view;
struct iosys_map;
-struct intel_fb_pin_params {
- const struct i915_gtt_view *view;
- unsigned int alignment;
- unsigned int phys_alignment;
- unsigned int vtd_guard;
- bool needs_cpu_lmem_access;
- bool needs_low_address;
- bool needs_physical;
- bool needs_fence;
-};
-
struct i915_vma *
intel_fb_pin_to_ggtt(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
const struct intel_fb_pin_params *pin_params,
#include <linux/vga_switcheroo.h>
#include <drm/clients/drm_client_setup.h>
+#include <drm/intel/display_parent_interface.h>
#include <drm/drm_crtc.h>
#include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_fb_helper.h>
struct drm_plane_state;
struct drm_scanout_buffer;
struct fb_info;
+struct i915_gtt_view;
struct i915_vma;
struct intel_dpt;
struct intel_dsb_buffer;
struct seq_file;
struct vm_area_struct;
+struct intel_fb_pin_params {
+ const struct i915_gtt_view *view;
+ unsigned int alignment;
+ unsigned int phys_alignment;
+ unsigned int vtd_guard;
+ bool needs_cpu_lmem_access;
+ bool needs_low_address;
+ bool needs_physical;
+ bool needs_fence;
+};
+
/* Keep struct definitions sorted */
struct intel_display_bo_interface {