Jonathan mentioned an unnamed static analyzer reported issue in
c_finish_bc_name.
It is actually a false positive, because the construction of the
loop_names vector guarantees that the last element of the vector
(if the vector is non-empty) always has either
C_DECL_LOOP_NAME (l) or C_DECL_SWITCH_NAME (l) (or both) flags
set, so c will be always non-NULL after the if at the start of the
loops.
The following patch is an attempt to help those static analyzers
(though dunno if it actually helps), by adding a checking assert.
2024-10-16 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* c-decl.cc (c_get_loop_names): Add checking assert that
c is non-NULL in the loop.
(c_finish_bc_name): Likewise.
{
if (C_DECL_LOOP_NAME (l) || C_DECL_SWITCH_NAME (l))
c = l;
+ gcc_checking_assert (c);
loop_names_hash->put (l, c);
if (i == first)
break;
{
if (C_DECL_LOOP_NAME (l) || C_DECL_SWITCH_NAME (l))
c = l;
+ gcc_checking_assert (c);
if (l == lab)
{
label = c;
{
if (C_DECL_LOOP_NAME (l) || C_DECL_SWITCH_NAME (l))
c = l;
+ gcc_checking_assert (c);
if (is_break || C_DECL_LOOP_NAME (c))
candidates.safe_push (IDENTIFIER_POINTER (DECL_NAME (l)));
}