Use more a consistent name.
gcc/rust/ChangeLog:
* backend/rust-compile-expr.cc (CompileExpr::visit): Rename method.
* checks/errors/privacy/rust-privacy-reporter.cc (PrivacyReporter::visit): Rename method.
* checks/errors/rust-const-checker.cc (ConstChecker::visit): Rename method.
* checks/errors/rust-unsafe-checker.cc (UnsafeChecker::visit): Rename method.
* hir/rust-hir-dump.cc (Dump::visit): Rename method.
* hir/tree/rust-hir-expr.h: Rename method.
* typecheck/rust-hir-type-check-expr.cc (TypeCheckExpr::visit): Rename method.
* typecheck/rust-tyty.h: Rename method.
CompileExpr::visit (HIR::CompoundAssignmentExpr &expr)
{
auto op = expr.get_expr_type ();
- auto lhs = CompileExpr::Compile (expr.get_left_expr ().get (), ctx);
- auto rhs = CompileExpr::Compile (expr.get_right_expr ().get (), ctx);
+ auto lhs = CompileExpr::Compile (expr.get_lhs ().get (), ctx);
+ auto rhs = CompileExpr::Compile (expr.get_rhs ().get (), ctx);
// this might be an operator overload situation lets check
TyTy::FnType *fntype;
expr.get_expr_type ());
auto compound_assignment
= resolve_operator_overload (lang_item_type, expr, lhs, rhs,
- expr.get_left_expr ().get (),
- expr.get_right_expr ().get ());
+ expr.get_lhs ().get (),
+ expr.get_rhs ().get ());
ctx->add_statement (compound_assignment);
return;
void
PrivacyReporter::visit (HIR::CompoundAssignmentExpr &expr)
{
- expr.get_left_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
- expr.get_right_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ expr.get_lhs ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ expr.get_rhs ()->accept_vis (*this);
}
void
void
ConstChecker::visit (CompoundAssignmentExpr &expr)
{
- expr.get_left_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
- expr.get_right_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ expr.get_lhs ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ expr.get_rhs ()->accept_vis (*this);
}
void
void
UnsafeChecker::visit (CompoundAssignmentExpr &expr)
{
- expr.get_left_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
- expr.get_right_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ expr.get_lhs ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ expr.get_rhs ()->accept_vis (*this);
}
void
begin ("CompoundAssignmentExpr");
do_operatorexpr (e);
- visit_field ("right_expr", *e.get_right_expr ());
+ visit_field ("right_expr", *e.get_rhs ());
std::string str;
void accept_vis (HIRFullVisitor &vis) override;
void accept_vis (HIRExpressionVisitor &vis) override;
- std::unique_ptr<Expr> &get_left_expr () { return main_or_left_expr; }
+ std::unique_ptr<Expr> &get_lhs () { return main_or_left_expr; }
- std::unique_ptr<Expr> &get_right_expr () { return right_expr; }
+ std::unique_ptr<Expr> &get_rhs () { return right_expr; }
void visit_lhs (HIRFullVisitor &vis) { main_or_left_expr->accept_vis (vis); }
void visit_rhs (HIRFullVisitor &vis) { right_expr->accept_vis (vis); }
{
infered = TyTy::TupleType::get_unit_type (expr.get_mappings ().get_hirid ());
- auto lhs = TypeCheckExpr::Resolve (expr.get_left_expr ().get ());
- auto rhs = TypeCheckExpr::Resolve (expr.get_right_expr ().get ());
+ auto lhs = TypeCheckExpr::Resolve (expr.get_lhs ().get ());
+ auto rhs = TypeCheckExpr::Resolve (expr.get_rhs ().get ());
// we dont care about the result of the unify from a compound assignment
// since this is a unit-type expr
coercion_site (expr.get_mappings ().get_hirid (),
- TyTy::TyWithLocation (lhs,
- expr.get_left_expr ()->get_locus ()),
- TyTy::TyWithLocation (rhs,
- expr.get_right_expr ()->get_locus ()),
+ TyTy::TyWithLocation (lhs, expr.get_lhs ()->get_locus ()),
+ TyTy::TyWithLocation (rhs, expr.get_rhs ()->get_locus ()),
expr.get_locus ());
auto lang_item_type
private:
TyVar element_type;
+ // FIXME: I dont think this should be in tyty - tyty should already be const
+ // evaluated
HIR::Expr &capacity_expr;
};