Commit
76934e495cdc ("cpuidle: Add sanity check for exit latency and
target residency") had added a check to prevent the exit latency of an
idle state from exceeding its target residency that later was limited to
printing a warning message in that case in commit
4bf944f3fcb6 ("cpuidle:
Warn instead of bailing out if target residency check fails").
However, a thorough code inspection with that in mind leads to the
conclusion that actually there are no assumptions in cpuidle regarding
the relationship between the exit latency and target residency of a
given idle state. It is generally assumed that the idle states table
provided by a cpuidle driver will be sorted by both the target residency
and exit latency in ascending order, but that's a different matter.
Accordingly, drop the check in question along with the message printed
when it triggers and the inaccurate comment preceding it.
Fixes: 4bf944f3fcb6 ("cpuidle: Warn instead of bailing out if target residency check fails")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
[ rjw: Subject fixup ]
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3444162.aeNJFYEL58@rafael.j.wysocki
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
s->exit_latency_ns = 0;
else
s->exit_latency = div_u64(s->exit_latency_ns, NSEC_PER_USEC);
-
- /*
- * Warn if the exit latency of a CPU idle state exceeds its
- * target residency which is assumed to never happen in cpuidle
- * in multiple places.
- */
- if (s->exit_latency_ns > s->target_residency_ns)
- pr_warn("Idle state %d target residency too low\n", i);
}
}