The test case assumes that alignof(int)=sizeof(int). But for some
targets this is not valid. For example, for PRU target,
alignof(int)=1 but sizeof(int)=4.
Fix the test case to align to twice the size of int, as the expected
dg-error messages suggest.
This patch fixes the test failures for PRU target.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/pr116357.c: Use sizeof(int) instead of alignof(int).
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <dimitar@dinux.eu>
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "" } */
-typedef int A __attribute__((aligned (2 * alignof (int))));
+typedef int A __attribute__((aligned (2 * sizeof (int))));
A a[4]; /* { dg-error "alignment of array elements is greater than element size" } */
-typedef volatile int B __attribute__((aligned (2 * alignof (int))));
+typedef volatile int B __attribute__((aligned (2 * sizeof (int))));
B b[4]; /* { dg-error "alignment of array elements is greater than element size" } */
-typedef const int C __attribute__((aligned (2 * alignof (int))));
+typedef const int C __attribute__((aligned (2 * sizeof (int))));
C c[4]; /* { dg-error "alignment of array elements is greater than element size" } */