We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit
c64bfc906600 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit
e9067bb50278 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87o6kojyqf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
const struct snd_soc_component_driver mtk_afe_pcm_platform = {
.name = AFE_PCM_NAME,
.pointer = mtk_afe_pcm_pointer,
- .pcm_construct = mtk_afe_pcm_new,
+ .pcm_new = mtk_afe_pcm_new,
.probe = mtk_afe_component_probe,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_afe_pcm_platform);
static const struct snd_soc_component_driver mt8186_afe_component = {
.name = AFE_PCM_NAME,
- .pcm_construct = mtk_afe_pcm_new,
+ .pcm_new = mtk_afe_pcm_new,
.pointer = mtk_afe_pcm_pointer,
.probe = mt8186_afe_component_probe,
};
static const struct snd_soc_component_driver mt8189_afe_component = {
.name = AFE_PCM_NAME,
.probe = mt8189_afe_component_probe,
- .pcm_construct = mtk_afe_pcm_new,
- .pcm_destruct = mt8189_afe_pcm_free,
+ .pcm_new = mtk_afe_pcm_new,
+ .pcm_free = mt8189_afe_pcm_free,
.open = mt8189_afe_pcm_open,
.pointer = mtk_afe_pcm_pointer,
};