The allowed syntaxes of atomic compare don't allow ()s around the condition
of ?:, but we were accepting it in one case for C++.
Fixed thusly.
2022-07-29 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/106448
* parser.cc (cp_parser_omp_atomic): For simple cast followed by
CPP_QUERY token, don't try cp_parser_binary_operation if compare
is true.
* c-c++-common/gomp/atomic-32.c: New test.
(cherry picked from commit
2dcceedb3c121f2498ae58d8414e7b8454b7bf55)
+2022-07-29 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
+
+ Backport from mainline:
+ 2022-07-29 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/106448
+ * parser.cc (cp_parser_omp_atomic): For simple cast followed by
+ CPP_QUERY token, don't try cp_parser_binary_operation if compare
+ is true.
+
2022-07-05 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Backport from mainline:
goto saw_error;
}
token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
- if (token->type != CPP_SEMICOLON && !cp_tree_equal (lhs, rhs1))
+ if (token->type != CPP_SEMICOLON
+ && (!compare || token->type != CPP_QUERY)
+ && !cp_tree_equal (lhs, rhs1))
{
cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse (parser);
cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser);
+2022-07-29 Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
+
+ Backport from mainline:
+ 2022-07-29 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/106448
+ * c-c++-common/gomp/atomic-32.c: New test.
+
2022-07-12 Andrew Stubbs <ams@codesourcery.com>
* lib/target-supports.exp
--- /dev/null
+/* PR c++/106448 */
+
+int x, expr;
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+ #pragma omp atomic compare
+ x = (expr > x) ? expr : x; /* { dg-error "invalid (form|operator)" } */
+ #pragma omp atomic compare
+ x = (x < expr) ? expr : x; /* { dg-error "invalid (form|operator)" } */
+ #pragma omp atomic compare
+ x = (x == expr) ? expr : x; /* { dg-error "invalid (form|operator)" } */
+}