Currently, the call to open_vni_port() within print_vnifilter_rtm() is
written in a way that is safe if there is a RTM_{NEW,DEL,GET}TUNNEL message
without any VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY attribute. However the close_vni_port()
call is written in a way that assumes there is always at least one
VXLAN_VNIFILTER_ENTRY attribute within every RTM_*TUNNEL message. At this
time, this assumption is correct. However, the code should be consistent in
its assumptions. Choose the safe approach and fix the asymmetry between the
open_vni_port() and close_vni_port() calls by guarding the latter call with
a check.
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
print_vni(t, tmsg->ifindex);
}
- close_vni_port();
+
+ if (!first)
+ close_vni_port();
print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s", _SL_);