Since we do not use the divide-by-64 option, there should be no
significant difference between the dedicated cycle counter and the
standard cycles event. Since using the latter on DSU-120 now has
the side-effect of allowing multiple cycles events to be scheduled
simultaneously (beneficial for multiple cycle-based metrics), there
seems little reason not to allow the same on older DSUs as well.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
unsigned long *used_mask = hw_events->used_mask;
if (evtype == DSU_PMU_EVT_CYCLES && dsu_pmu->has_pmccntr) {
- if (test_and_set_bit(DSU_PMU_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER, used_mask))
- return -EAGAIN;
- return DSU_PMU_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER;
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(DSU_PMU_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER, used_mask))
+ return DSU_PMU_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER;
}
idx = find_first_zero_bit(used_mask, dsu_pmu->num_counters);