Both testcases miss some effective target requires.
PR testsuite/116660
* gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-12.c: Add vect_pack_trunc.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-6.c: Add vect_char_add, remove
explicit 32bit sparc XFAIL.
/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_pack_trunc } */
#include <stdarg.h>
#include "tree-vect.h"
/* Disabling epilogues until we find a better way to deal with scans. */
/* { dg-additional-options "--param vect-epilogues-nomask=0" } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_char_add } */
/* { dg-add-options double_vectors } */
#include <stdarg.h>
return 0;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { xfail { sparc*-*-* && ilp32 } }} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using versioning" 6 "vect" { target { vect_no_align && { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 6 "vect" { xfail { ! { vect_unaligned_possible && vect_align_stack_vars } } } } } */