The macro STM_SAI_HAS_EXT_SYNC accepts a parameter x, but
it was not used, rather the variable sai was directly used,
which may be a local variable inside a function that calls
the macros.
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240821070815.2326534-6-lihongbo22@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
#define STM_SAI_PROTOCOL_IS_SPDIF(ip) ((ip)->spdif)
#define STM_SAI_HAS_SPDIF(x) ((x)->pdata->conf.has_spdif_pdm)
#define STM_SAI_HAS_PDM(x) ((x)->pdata->conf.has_spdif_pdm)
-#define STM_SAI_HAS_EXT_SYNC(x) (!STM_SAI_IS_F4(sai->pdata))
+#define STM_SAI_HAS_EXT_SYNC(x) (!STM_SAI_IS_F4((x)->pdata))
#define SAI_IEC60958_BLOCK_FRAMES 192
#define SAI_IEC60958_STATUS_BYTES 24