<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title">
<a name="relnotes_security"></a>Security Fixes</h3></div></div></div>
- <div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: disc; ">
-<li class="listitem">
- <p>
- Addresses could be referenced after being freed during resolver
- processing, causing an assertion failure. The chances of this
- happening were remote, but the introduction of a delay in
- resolution increased them. This bug is disclosed in
- CVE-2017-3145. [RT #46839]
- </p>
- </li>
-<li class="listitem">
+ <div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: disc; "><li class="listitem">
<p>
update-policy rules that otherwise ignore the name field now
require that it be set to "." to ensure that any type list
- present is properly interpreted. If the name field was omitted
- from the rule declaration and a type list was present it wouldn't
- be interpreted as expected.
+ present is properly interpreted. Previously, if the name field
+ was omitted from the rule declaration but a type list was
+ present, it wouldn't be interpreted as expected.
</p>
- </li>
-</ul></div>
+ </li></ul></div>
</div>
<div class="section">
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p>
- Attempting to validate improperly unsigned CNAME responses
- from secure zones could cause a validator loop. This caused
- a delay in returning SERVFAIL and also increased the chances
- of encountering the crash bug described in CVE-2017-3145.
- [RT #46839]
+ <span class="command"><strong>named</strong></span> could crash when acting as a slave for a
+ catalog zone if zone contained a master definition without an IP
+ address. [RT #45999]
</p>
</li>
</ul></div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title">
<a name="relnotes_security"></a>Security Fixes</h3></div></div></div>
- <div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: disc; ">
-<li class="listitem">
- <p>
- Addresses could be referenced after being freed during resolver
- processing, causing an assertion failure. The chances of this
- happening were remote, but the introduction of a delay in
- resolution increased them. This bug is disclosed in
- CVE-2017-3145. [RT #46839]
- </p>
- </li>
-<li class="listitem">
+ <div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: disc; "><li class="listitem">
<p>
update-policy rules that otherwise ignore the name field now
require that it be set to "." to ensure that any type list
- present is properly interpreted. If the name field was omitted
- from the rule declaration and a type list was present it wouldn't
- be interpreted as expected.
+ present is properly interpreted. Previously, if the name field
+ was omitted from the rule declaration but a type list was
+ present, it wouldn't be interpreted as expected.
</p>
- </li>
-</ul></div>
+ </li></ul></div>
</div>
<div class="section">
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p>
- Attempting to validate improperly unsigned CNAME responses
- from secure zones could cause a validator loop. This caused
- a delay in returning SERVFAIL and also increased the chances
- of encountering the crash bug described in CVE-2017-3145.
- [RT #46839]
+ <span class="command"><strong>named</strong></span> could crash when acting as a slave for a
+ catalog zone if zone contained a master definition without an IP
+ address. [RT #45999]
</p>
</li>
</ul></div>