A bug in the simplification I did around 91618; at this point X<int>::f has
DECL_IMPLICIT_INSTANTIATION set, but we've already identified what template
it corresponds to, so we don't want to call check_explicit_specialization.
To distinguish this case we need to look at DECL_TI_TEMPLATE. grokfndecl
has for a long time set it to the OVERLOAD in this case, while the new cases
I added for 91618 were leaving DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO null; let's adjust them to
match.
PR c++/91618
PR c++/109649
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* friend.cc (do_friend): Don't call check_explicit_specialization if
DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO is already set.
* decl2.cc (check_classfn): Set DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO.
* name-lookup.cc (set_decl_namespace): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/template/friend77.C: New test.
So tell check_explicit_specialization to look for a match. */
SET_DECL_IMPLICIT_INSTANTIATION (function);
+ DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (function) = build_template_info (fns, NULL_TREE);
matched = function;
}
if (decl == error_mark_node)
return error_mark_node;
- if (!class_template_depth && DECL_IMPLICIT_INSTANTIATION (decl))
+ if (!class_template_depth && DECL_IMPLICIT_INSTANTIATION (decl)
+ && TREE_CODE (DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (decl)) != TEMPLATE_DECL)
/* "[if no non-template match is found,] each remaining function template
is replaced with the specialization chosen by deduction from the
friend declaration or discarded if deduction fails."
So tell check_explicit_specialization to look for a match. */
SET_DECL_IMPLICIT_INSTANTIATION (decl);
+ DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (decl) = build_template_info (old, NULL_TREE);
return;
}
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/109649
+
+template <typename>
+class X
+{
+ void f(){}
+};
+
+class Y
+{
+ friend void X<int>::f(); // { dg-error "private" }
+};
+
+int main()
+{
+ X<int> t;
+ t.f(); // { dg-error "private" }
+ Y b;
+}