rtx tmpreg = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, 1);
emit_move_insn (tmpreg, delta);
- if (TARGET_DISABLE_INDEXING)
+ if (!TARGET_NO_SPACE_REGS || TARGET_DISABLE_INDEXING)
{
emit_move_insn (tmpreg, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, tmpreg, basereg));
src = gen_rtx_MEM (word_mode, tmpreg);
}
if (!TARGET_DISABLE_INDEXING
- /* Only accept the "canonical" INDEX+BASE operand order
- on targets with non-equivalent space registers. */
- && (TARGET_NO_SPACE_REGS
- ? REG_P (index)
- : (base == XEXP (x, 1) && REG_P (index)
- && (reload_completed
- || (reload_in_progress && HARD_REGISTER_P (base))
- || REG_POINTER (base))
- && (reload_completed
- || (reload_in_progress && HARD_REGISTER_P (index))
- || !REG_POINTER (index))))
+ /* Currently, the REG_POINTER flag is not set in a variety
+ of situations (e.g., call arguments and pointer arithmetic).
+ As a result, we can't reliably determine when unscaled
+ addresses are legitimate on targets that need space register
+ selection. */
+ && TARGET_NO_SPACE_REGS
+ && REG_P (index)
&& MODE_OK_FOR_UNSCALED_INDEXING_P (mode)
&& (strict ? STRICT_REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P (index)
: REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P (index))