Respond to rpluem's ball busting :)

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@485013 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 2d85d5dcb348019c6d79a65d61bf0c7035191d95..d72903b55dbaab348b4e918f97275d151cee0a7f 100644 (file)
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -275,6 +275,9 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      +1: jim
      +0: rpluem: Shouldn't we remove this code on 2.2.x? Keeping seems to be ok
          for me on trunk, but on a stable branch?
+         jim says: the reason why we keep it is in case we
+         ever start using it. So we keep the framework in
+         that case. Make trunk backports easier.
 
    * mod_proxy: Log unlock errors (as we do with locking errors).
      Add additional clarification on where the error occurred.
@@ -283,7 +286,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
        http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=484787
        http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=484978
      2.2.x version of patch:
-       Trunk version works.
+       For r484787, see: http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/lock.txt
+       otherwise, trunk version works.
      +1: jim
-     rpluem says: r484787 does not apply cleanly to 2.2.x