Unfortunately the extract_autos_r fix in
r13-4799-ga7c8036b26082d is
derailed by the fact that walk_tree_1 currently walks the elements of a
TREE_VEC in reverse, which means for A<auto, auto> in the below testcase
extract_autos_r ends up adjusting the TEMPLATE_TYPE_IDX of the first
auto instead of the second one, and the first auto is the canonical auto
of level 2 (and index 0), so we rightfully trigger the sanity check
added in that commit.
It seems TREE_VEC and VECTOR_CST are the only trees we walk in reverse,
and this has been the case since r21884 whence the original version of
walk_tree_1 was introduced. But that's arguably unnatural and not
consistent with how we walk all other compound trees such as CONSTRUCTORs
and EXPR_P trees in forward order.
So this patch makes walk_tree_1 walk TREE_VEC (and VECTOR_CST) in
forward order as well, which fixes the testcase. Doing so revealed that
keep_template_parm grows the list of found template parameters from the
front, which previously compensated for the TREE_VEC behavior, so now we
should grow it from the back.
PR c++/101886
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (find_template_parameter_info::parm_list_tail):
New data member.
(keep_template_parm): Use parm_list_tail to append rather
than prepend to parm_list.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree.cc (walk_tree_1) <case TREE_VEC>: Walk the elements
in forward instead of reverse order.
<case VECTOR_CST>: Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic12.C: Adjust expected order of
template parameters within pretty printed parameter mapping.
* g++.dg/concepts/auto6.C: New test.
struct find_template_parameter_info
{
explicit find_template_parameter_info (tree ctx_parms)
- : parm_list (NULL_TREE),
- ctx_parms (ctx_parms),
+ : ctx_parms (ctx_parms),
max_depth (TMPL_PARMS_DEPTH (ctx_parms))
{}
hash_set<tree> visited;
hash_set<tree> parms;
- tree parm_list;
+ tree parm_list = NULL_TREE;
+ tree *parm_list_tail = &parm_list;
tree ctx_parms;
int max_depth;
};
if (TYPE_P (t))
t = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (t);
if (!ftpi->parms.add (t))
- ftpi->parm_list = tree_cons (NULL_TREE, t, ftpi->parm_list);
+ {
+ /* Append T to PARM_LIST. */
+ tree node = build_tree_list (NULL_TREE, t);
+ *ftpi->parm_list_tail = node;
+ ftpi->parm_list_tail = &TREE_CHAIN (node);
+ }
/* Verify the parameter we found has a valid index. */
if (flag_checking)
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/101886
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17_only } }
+// { dg-options "-fconcepts-ts" }
+
+template<typename, typename> struct A { };
+
+template<class T>
+void f() {
+ A<int, int> a;
+ A<auto, auto> b1 = a;
+ A<auto, auto> b2 = a;
+}
+
+template void f<int>();
template<typename T, typename... Args>
concept c1 = requires (T t, Args... args) { *t; };
-// { dg-message "in requirements with .T t., .Args ... args. .with Args = \{\}; T = int" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+// { dg-message "in requirements with .T t., .Args ... args. .with T = int; Args = \{\}" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
static_assert(c1<int>); // { dg-error "failed" }
if (len == 0)
break;
- /* Walk all elements but the first. */
- while (--len)
- WALK_SUBTREE (TREE_VEC_ELT (*tp, len));
+ /* Walk all elements but the last. */
+ for (int i = 0; i < len - 1; ++i)
+ WALK_SUBTREE (TREE_VEC_ELT (*tp, i));
- /* Now walk the first one as a tail call. */
- WALK_SUBTREE_TAIL (TREE_VEC_ELT (*tp, 0));
+ /* Now walk the last one as a tail call. */
+ WALK_SUBTREE_TAIL (TREE_VEC_ELT (*tp, len - 1));
}
case VECTOR_CST:
unsigned len = vector_cst_encoded_nelts (*tp);
if (len == 0)
break;
- /* Walk all elements but the first. */
- while (--len)
- WALK_SUBTREE (VECTOR_CST_ENCODED_ELT (*tp, len));
- /* Now walk the first one as a tail call. */
- WALK_SUBTREE_TAIL (VECTOR_CST_ENCODED_ELT (*tp, 0));
+ /* Walk all elements but the last. */
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < len - 1; ++i)
+ WALK_SUBTREE (VECTOR_CST_ENCODED_ELT (*tp, i));
+ /* Now walk the last one as a tail call. */
+ WALK_SUBTREE_TAIL (VECTOR_CST_ENCODED_ELT (*tp, len - 1));
}
case COMPLEX_CST: