c++: concepts TS and explicit specialization [PR101098]

duplicate_decls was not recognizing the explicit specialization as matching
the implicit specialization of g<Y> because
function_requirements_equivalent_p was seeing the C constraint on the
implicit one and not on the explicit.

	PR c++/101098

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* decl.c (function_requirements_equivalent_p): Only compare
	trailing requirements on a specialization.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/concepts/explicit-spec1.C: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index 9cfe62a98eeb47bf5b2acabeced44a63886a0ec9..5e101ffb8437c9d4780d8134d688fc7e08148471 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -944,7 +944,9 @@ static bool
 function_requirements_equivalent_p (tree newfn, tree oldfn)
 {
   /* In the concepts TS, the combined constraints are compared.  */
-  if (cxx_dialect < cxx20)
+  if (cxx_dialect < cxx20
+      && (DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (newfn)
+         <= DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (oldfn)))
     {
       tree ci1 = get_constraints (oldfn);
       tree ci2 = get_constraints (newfn);

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/explicit-spec1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/explicit-spec1.C
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d9b6b3d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/explicit-spec1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// PR c++/101098
+// { dg-do compile { target concepts } }
+
+template<typename T> concept C = __is_class(T);
+struct Y { int n; } y;
+template<C T> void g(T) { }
+int called;
+template<> void g(Y) { called = 3; }
+int main() { g(y); }