__atomic_test_and_set: Fall back to library, not non-atomic code

Make __atomic_test_and_set consistent with other __atomic_ and __sync_
builtins: call a matching library function instead of emitting
non-atomic code when the target has no direct insn support.

There's special-case code handling targetm.atomic_test_and_set_trueval
!= 1 trying a modified maybe_emit_sync_lock_test_and_set.  Previously,
if that worked but its matching emit_store_flag_force returned NULL,
we'd segfault later on.  Now that the caller handles NULL, gcc_assert
here instead.

While the referenced PR:s are ARM-specific, the issue is general.

	PR target/107567
	PR target/109166
	* builtins.cc (expand_builtin) <case BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET>:
	Handle failure from expand_builtin_atomic_test_and_set.
	* optabs.cc (expand_atomic_test_and_set): When all attempts fail to
	generate atomic code through target support, return NULL
	instead of emitting non-atomic code.  Also, for code handling
	targetm.atomic_test_and_set_trueval != 1, gcc_assert result
	from calling emit_store_flag_force instead of returning NULL.

diff --git a/gcc/builtins.cc b/gcc/builtins.cc
index 6e4274bb2a4e05e3e2e00cbfe0cae5d211cda079..40dfd36a31975e76d7ac690e2ee846cb1d59a935 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/builtins.cc
+++ b/gcc/builtins.cc
@@ -8387,7 +8387,10 @@ expand_builtin (tree exp, rtx target, rtx subtarget, machine_mode mode,
       break;
 
     case BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET:
-      return expand_builtin_atomic_test_and_set (exp, target);
+      target = expand_builtin_atomic_test_and_set (exp, target);
+      if (target)
+       return target;
+      break;
 
     case BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_CLEAR:
       return expand_builtin_atomic_clear (exp);

diff --git a/gcc/optabs.cc b/gcc/optabs.cc
index 8b96f23aec05456bec908af060d1d1e788e5ebb0..e1898da22808f76971de1943039bd9fcf4404f58 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/optabs.cc
+++ b/gcc/optabs.cc
@@ -7080,25 +7080,17 @@ expand_atomic_test_and_set (rtx target, rtx mem, enum memmodel model)
   /* Recall that the legacy lock_test_and_set optab was allowed to do magic
      things with the value 1.  Thus we try again without trueval.  */
   if (!ret && targetm.atomic_test_and_set_trueval != 1)
-    ret = maybe_emit_sync_lock_test_and_set (subtarget, mem, const1_rtx, model);
-
-  /* Failing all else, assume a single threaded environment and simply
-     perform the operation.  */
-  if (!ret)
     {
-      /* If the result is ignored skip the move to target.  */
-      if (subtarget != const0_rtx)
-        emit_move_insn (subtarget, mem);
+      ret = maybe_emit_sync_lock_test_and_set (subtarget, mem, const1_rtx, model);
 
-      emit_move_insn (mem, trueval);
-      ret = subtarget;
+      if (ret)
+       {
+         /* Rectify the not-one trueval.  */
+         ret = emit_store_flag_force (target, NE, ret, const0_rtx, mode, 0, 1);
+         gcc_assert (ret);
+       }
     }
 
-  /* Recall that have to return a boolean value; rectify if trueval
-     is not exactly one.  */
-  if (targetm.atomic_test_and_set_trueval != 1)
-    ret = emit_store_flag_force (target, NE, ret, const0_rtx, mode, 0, 1);
-  
   return ret;
 }