Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
exit 1
fi
-# pdns (auth) is handled seperately, it needs a special find condition which is hard to do with
+# pdns (auth) is handled separately, it needs a special find condition which is hard to do with
# vars, as we don't want the asterisks to expand prematurely. So repeat the body of the loop below
# with a find condition for pdns to exclude accidentally matching pdns-recursor*.
for prog in pdns-recursor dnsdist; do
{
// RFC7873 section 5.2.2
// In summary, valid cookie lengths are 8 and 16 to 40 inclusive.
- // That's the total size. We account for client and server size seperately
+ // That's the total size. We account for client and server size separately
return (
client.size() == 8 && (server.empty() || (server.size() >= 8 && server.size() <= 32)));
}
- Table based routing?
- Ripping out yahttp stuff, providing some basic classes only. ATM we do use a few yahttp include files (but no .cc)
- Some classes (NetmaskGroup, ComboAddress) need a UniquePtr Wrapper to keep them opaque (iputils
- cannot be included without big headaches in bridge.hh at the moment). We could seperate
+ cannot be included without big headaches in bridge.hh at the moment). We could separate
NetmaskGroup, but I expect ComboAddress to not work as it is union.
- Avoid unsafe? Can it be done?
*/