]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/kernel/linux.git/commitdiff
hrtimer: Less agressive interrupt 'hang' handling
authorPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 19:02:21 +0000 (20:02 +0100)
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 20:13:55 +0000 (21:13 +0100)
When the hrtimer_interrupt needs to restart more than 3 times and still has
expired timers, the interrupt is considered hung. To give the system a
little time to recover, the hardware timer is programmed a little into the
future.

Prior to commit 288924384856 ("hrtimer: Re-arrange hrtimer_interrupt()"),
this was relative to the amount of time spend serving the interrupt with a
max of 100 msec.

However, in order to simplify, and because this condition 'should' not
happen, the timeout was unconditionally set to 100 msec.

'Obviously' there is a benchmark that hits this hard, by programming a
ton of very short timers :-/

Since reprogramming is decoupled from the interrupt handling, the actual
execution time is lost, however the code does track max_hang_time. Using
that, rather than the 100 ms max restores performance.

  stress-ng --timeout 60 --times --verify --metrics --no-rand-seed --timermix 64

                  bogo ops/s
 288924384856^1: 23715979.93
 288924384856:   11550049.77
 patched:        23361116.78

Additionally, Thomas noted that cpu_base->hang_detected should not be
cleared until the next interrupt, such that __hrtimer_reprogram() won't
undo the extra delay.

Fixes: 288924384856 ("hrtimer: Re-arrange hrtimer_interrupt()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260311121500.GF652779@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202603102229.74b9dee4-lkp@intel.com
kernel/time/hrtimer.c

index b94bd56b739f61b1cd3790a0ac1948baf0e4d653..cafd6771a225514577bdff6a8ac347b7084735cf 100644 (file)
@@ -2031,8 +2031,8 @@ static void hrtimer_rearm(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, ktime_t expires_nex
                 * Give the system a chance to do something else than looping
                 * on hrtimer interrupts.
                 */
-               expires_next = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), 100 * NSEC_PER_MSEC);
-               cpu_base->hang_detected = false;
+               expires_next = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(),
+                                           min(100 * NSEC_PER_MSEC, cpu_base->max_hang_time));
        }
        hrtimer_rearm_event(expires_next, deferred);
 }
@@ -2121,6 +2121,7 @@ retry:
         */
        now = hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
        expires_next = hrtimer_update_next_event(cpu_base);
+       cpu_base->hang_detected = false;
        if (expires_next < now) {
                if (++retries < 3)
                        goto retry;