For a struct that is actually used, foo is simply a stupid

name to use... :)

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@580937 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 8ca3b45354ba073c84f4c5bbcfc9b9b22cfdce9e..40ff7884f88db3e65aad6d9e30a6e466a74b419f 100644 (file)
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -229,12 +229,16 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=580457
      +1: niq
      +0: rpluem says: Please give struct foo a meaningful name first.
+     -0: jim says: Agree with rpluem. Actually, I'd veto this patch
+                   based simply on that naming if I could.
 
    * mod_proxy_http: Remove Warning headers with wrong date
      PR 16138
      http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=580782
      +1: niq
      +0: rpluem says: Please give struct foo a meaningful name first.
+     -0: jim says: Agree with rpluem. Actually, I'd veto this patch
+                   based simply on that naming if I could.
 
 PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED