isotp_notify() unregisters the (RCU) CAN filters via can_rx_unregister()
and clears so->bound without waiting for a grace period. isotp_release()
uses so->bound to decide whether it needs to call synchronize_rcu()
before cancelling so->rxtimer, so when NETDEV_UNREGISTER runs first it
skips that synchronize_rcu() and can cancel the timer while an
in-flight isotp_rcv() is still executing and about to re-arm it via
isotp_send_fc(), leading to a use-after-free timer callback on the
freed socket.
sakisho-bot remarked a problem with rtnl_lock held in isotp_notify(),
therefore make isotp_release() always call synchronize_rcu() before
cancelling the timers, regardless of so->bound. This still closes the
original race (isotp_notify() clearing so->bound without waiting for
in-flight isotp_rcv() callers before isotp_release() cancels the RX
timer) without adding any RCU wait to the netdevice notifier path.
Fixes: 14a4696bc311 ("can: isotp: isotp_release(): omit unintended hrtimer restart on socket release")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20260707085210.6B6C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
Reported-by: Nico Yip <zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260712-isotp-fixes-v10-1-793a1b1ce17f@hartkopp.net
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
SINGLE_MASK(so->txid),
isotp_rcv_echo, sk);
dev_put(dev);
- synchronize_rcu();
}
}
}
+ /* Always wait for a grace period before touching the timers below.
+ * A concurrent NETDEV_UNREGISTER may have already unregistered our
+ * filters and cleared so->bound in isotp_notify() without waiting
+ * for in-flight isotp_rcv() callers to finish, so this call must not
+ * be skipped just because so->bound is already 0 here.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
hrtimer_cancel(&so->txfrtimer);
hrtimer_cancel(&so->txtimer);
hrtimer_cancel(&so->rxtimer);