This issue was reported and discusses under [1] which is linked in NVD CVE report.
It was already documented that some parts or libarchive are thread safe and some not.
[2] was now merged to document that also reported function is not thread safe.
So this CVE *now* reports thread race condition for non-thread-safe function.
And as such the CVE report is now invalid.
The issue is still not closed for 2 reasons:
* better document what is and what is not thread safe
* request to public if someone could make these functions thread safe
This should however not invalidate above statment about ignoring this CVE.
[1] https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/1876
[2] https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/pull/1875
Signed-off-by: Peter Marko <peter.marko@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "ba6d02f15ba04aba9c23fd5f236bb234eab9d5209e95d1c4df85c44d5f19b9b3"
+CVE_STATUS[CVE-2023-30571] = "upstream-wontfix: upstream has documented that reported function is not thread-safe"
+
inherit autotools update-alternatives pkgconfig
CPPFLAGS += "-I${WORKDIR}/extra-includes"