So far, if only the starting request was a DCERPC request, it would be
considered DCERPC traffic. Since ALTER_CONTEXT is a valid request type,
it should be accepted too.
Reported and patch proposed in the following Redmine ticket by
InterNALXz.
Bug 6191
(cherry picked from commit
8770431986598f195d57e570287c40ee3dec0cfa)
fn probe(input: &[u8]) -> (bool, bool) {
match parser::parse_dcerpc_header(input) {
Ok((_, hdr)) => {
- let is_request = hdr.hdrtype == 0x00;
+ let is_request = hdr.hdrtype == 0x00 || hdr.hdrtype == 0x0e;
let is_dcerpc = hdr.rpc_vers == 0x05 && hdr.rpc_vers_minor == 0x00;
return (is_dcerpc, is_request);
},