There is an unnecessary NULL check of inode in cifs_oplock_break(), since
there are multiple dereferences of cinode prior to it.
Based on usage of cifs_oplock_break() in cifs_new_fileinfo() we can safely
assume that inode is not NULL, so there is no need to check inode in
cifs_oplock_break() at all.
Therefore, this redundant check can be removed.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Abramov <i.abramov@mt-integration.ru>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
cinode->oplock = 0;
}
- if (inode && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
+ if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
if (CIFS_CACHE_READ(cinode))
break_lease(inode, O_RDONLY);
else