KS_HASH_MODE_CASE_INSENSITIVE,
KS_HASH_MODE_INT,
KS_HASH_MODE_INT64,
- KS_HASH_MODE_PTR
+ KS_HASH_MODE_PTR,
+ KS_HASH_MODE_ARBITRARY
} ks_hash_mode_t;
KS_DECLARE(void) ks_hash_set_flags(ks_hash_t *h, ks_hash_flag_t flags);
+KS_DECLARE(void) ks_hash_set_keysize(ks_hash_t *h, ks_size_t keysize);
KS_DECLARE(void) ks_hash_set_destructor(ks_hash_t *h, ks_hash_destructor_t destructor);
/*****************************************************************************
return hash;
}
+#define hashsize(n) ((uint32_t)1<<(n))
+#define hashmask(n) (hashsize(n)-1)
+#define rot(x,k) (((x)<<(k)) | ((x)>>(32-(k))))
+
+/*
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+mix -- mix 3 32-bit values reversibly.
+
+This is reversible, so any information in (a,b,c) before mix() is
+still in (a,b,c) after mix().
+
+If four pairs of (a,b,c) inputs are run through mix(), or through
+mix() in reverse, there are at least 32 bits of the output that
+are sometimes the same for one pair and different for another pair.
+This was tested for:
+* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination
+ of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of
+ (a,b,c).
+* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed
+ the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as
+ is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit
+ difference.
+* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or
+ all zero plus a counter that starts at zero.
+
+Some k values for my "a-=c; a^=rot(c,k); c+=b;" arrangement that
+satisfy this are
+ 4 6 8 16 19 4
+ 9 15 3 18 27 15
+ 14 9 3 7 17 3
+Well, "9 15 3 18 27 15" didn't quite get 32 bits diffing
+for "differ" defined as + with a one-bit base and a two-bit delta. I
+used http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/avalanche.html to choose
+the operations, constants, and arrangements of the variables.
+
+This does not achieve avalanche. There are input bits of (a,b,c)
+that fail to affect some output bits of (a,b,c), especially of a. The
+most thoroughly mixed value is c, but it doesn't really even achieve
+avalanche in c.
+
+This allows some parallelism. Read-after-writes are good at doubling
+the number of bits affected, so the goal of mixing pulls in the opposite
+direction as the goal of parallelism. I did what I could. Rotates
+seem to cost as much as shifts on every machine I could lay my hands
+on, and rotates are much kinder to the top and bottom bits, so I used
+rotates.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+*/
+#define mix(a,b,c) \
+{ \
+ a -= c; a ^= rot(c, 4); c += b; \
+ b -= a; b ^= rot(a, 6); a += c; \
+ c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 8); b += a; \
+ a -= c; a ^= rot(c,16); c += b; \
+ b -= a; b ^= rot(a,19); a += c; \
+ c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 4); b += a; \
+}
+
+/*
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+mix -- mix 3 32-bit values reversibly.
+
+This is reversible, so any information in (a,b,c) before mix() is
+still in (a,b,c) after mix().
+
+If four pairs of (a,b,c) inputs are run through mix(), or through
+mix() in reverse, there are at least 32 bits of the output that
+are sometimes the same for one pair and different for another pair.
+This was tested for:
+* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination
+ of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of
+ (a,b,c).
+* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed
+ the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as
+ is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit
+ difference.
+* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or
+ all zero plus a counter that starts at zero.
+
+Some k values for my "a-=c; a^=rot(c,k); c+=b;" arrangement that
+satisfy this are
+ 4 6 8 16 19 4
+ 9 15 3 18 27 15
+ 14 9 3 7 17 3
+Well, "9 15 3 18 27 15" didn't quite get 32 bits diffing
+for "differ" defined as + with a one-bit base and a two-bit delta. I
+used http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/avalanche.html to choose
+the operations, constants, and arrangements of the variables.
+
+This does not achieve avalanche. There are input bits of (a,b,c)
+that fail to affect some output bits of (a,b,c), especially of a. The
+most thoroughly mixed value is c, but it doesn't really even achieve
+avalanche in c.
+
+This allows some parallelism. Read-after-writes are good at doubling
+the number of bits affected, so the goal of mixing pulls in the opposite
+direction as the goal of parallelism. I did what I could. Rotates
+seem to cost as much as shifts on every machine I could lay my hands
+on, and rotates are much kinder to the top and bottom bits, so I used
+rotates.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+*/
+#define mix(a,b,c) \
+{ \
+ a -= c; a ^= rot(c, 4); c += b; \
+ b -= a; b ^= rot(a, 6); a += c; \
+ c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 8); b += a; \
+ a -= c; a ^= rot(c,16); c += b; \
+ b -= a; b ^= rot(a,19); a += c; \
+ c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 4); b += a; \
+}
+
+/*
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+final -- final mixing of 3 32-bit values (a,b,c) into c
+
+Pairs of (a,b,c) values differing in only a few bits will usually
+produce values of c that look totally different. This was tested for
+* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination
+ of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of
+ (a,b,c).
+* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed
+ the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as
+ is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit
+ difference.
+* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or
+ all zero plus a counter that starts at zero.
+
+These constants passed:
+ 14 11 25 16 4 14 24
+ 12 14 25 16 4 14 24
+and these came close:
+ 4 8 15 26 3 22 24
+ 10 8 15 26 3 22 24
+ 11 8 15 26 3 22 24
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+*/
+#define final(a,b,c) \
+{ \
+ c ^= b; c -= rot(b,14); \
+ a ^= c; a -= rot(c,11); \
+ b ^= a; b -= rot(a,25); \
+ c ^= b; c -= rot(b,16); \
+ a ^= c; a -= rot(c,4); \
+ b ^= a; b -= rot(a,14); \
+ c ^= b; c -= rot(b,24); \
+}
+
+
+
+
+/*
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+hashlittle() -- hash a variable-length key into a 32-bit value
+ k : the key (the unaligned variable-length array of bytes)
+ length : the length of the key, counting by bytes
+ initval : can be any 4-byte value
+Returns a 32-bit value. Every bit of the key affects every bit of
+the return value. Two keys differing by one or two bits will have
+totally different hash values.
+
+The best hash table sizes are powers of 2. There is no need to do
+mod a prime (mod is sooo slow!). If you need less than 32 bits,
+use a bitmask. For example, if you need only 10 bits, do
+ h = (h & hashmask(10));
+In which case, the hash table should have hashsize(10) elements.
+
+If you are hashing n strings (uint8_t **)k, do it like this:
+ for (i=0, h=0; i<n; ++i) h = hashlittle( k[i], len[i], h);
+
+By Bob Jenkins, 2006. bob_jenkins@burtleburtle.net. You may use this
+code any way you wish, private, educational, or commercial. It's free.
+
+Use for hash table lookup, or anything where one collision in 2^^32 is
+acceptable. Do NOT use for cryptographic purposes.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+*/
+
+static __inline uint32_t ks_hash_default_arbitrary( const void *key, ks_size_t length, uint32_t initval)
+{
+ uint32_t a,b,c; /* internal state */
+ union { const void *ptr; ks_size_t i; } u; /* needed for Mac Powerbook G4 */
+
+ /* Set up the internal state */
+ a = b = c = 0xdeadbeef + ((uint32_t)length) + initval;
+
+ u.ptr = key;
+ if (KS_LITTLE_ENDIAN && ((u.i & 0x3) == 0)) {
+ const uint32_t *k = (const uint32_t *)key; /* read 32-bit chunks */
+
+ /*------ all but last block: aligned reads and affect 32 bits of (a,b,c) */
+ while (length > 12)
+ {
+ a += k[0];
+ b += k[1];
+ c += k[2];
+ mix(a,b,c);
+ length -= 12;
+ k += 3;
+ }
+
+ /*----------------------------- handle the last (probably partial) block */
+ /*
+ * "k[2]&0xffffff" actually reads beyond the end of the string, but
+ * then masks off the part it's not allowed to read. Because the
+ * string is aligned, the masked-off tail is in the same word as the
+ * rest of the string. Every machine with memory protection I've seen
+ * does it on word boundaries, so is OK with this. But VALGRIND will
+ * still catch it and complain. The masking trick does make the hash
+ * noticably faster for short strings (like English words).
+ */
+#ifndef VALGRIND
+
+ switch(length)
+ {
+ case 12: c+=k[2]; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 11: c+=k[2]&0xffffff; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 10: c+=k[2]&0xffff; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 9 : c+=k[2]&0xff; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 8 : b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 7 : b+=k[1]&0xffffff; a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 6 : b+=k[1]&0xffff; a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 5 : b+=k[1]&0xff; a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 4 : a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 3 : a+=k[0]&0xffffff; break;
+ case 2 : a+=k[0]&0xffff; break;
+ case 1 : a+=k[0]&0xff; break;
+ case 0 : return c; /* zero length strings require no mixing */
+ }
+
+#else /* make valgrind happy */
+
+ k8 = (const uint8_t *)k;
+ switch(length)
+ {
+ case 12: c+=k[2]; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 11: c+=((uint32_t)k8[10])<<16; /* fall through */
+ case 10: c+=((uint32_t)k8[9])<<8; /* fall through */
+ case 9 : c+=k8[8]; /* fall through */
+ case 8 : b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 7 : b+=((uint32_t)k8[6])<<16; /* fall through */
+ case 6 : b+=((uint32_t)k8[5])<<8; /* fall through */
+ case 5 : b+=k8[4]; /* fall through */
+ case 4 : a+=k[0]; break;
+ case 3 : a+=((uint32_t)k8[2])<<16; /* fall through */
+ case 2 : a+=((uint32_t)k8[1])<<8; /* fall through */
+ case 1 : a+=k8[0]; break;
+ case 0 : return c;
+ }
+
+#endif /* !valgrind */
+
+ } else if (KS_LITTLE_ENDIAN && ((u.i & 0x1) == 0)) {
+ const uint16_t *k = (const uint16_t *)key; /* read 16-bit chunks */
+ const uint8_t *k8;
+
+ /*--------------- all but last block: aligned reads and different mixing */
+ while (length > 12)
+ {
+ a += k[0] + (((uint32_t)k[1])<<16);
+ b += k[2] + (((uint32_t)k[3])<<16);
+ c += k[4] + (((uint32_t)k[5])<<16);
+ mix(a,b,c);
+ length -= 12;
+ k += 6;
+ }
+
+ /*----------------------------- handle the last (probably partial) block */
+ k8 = (const uint8_t *)k;
+ switch(length)
+ {
+ case 12: c+=k[4]+(((uint32_t)k[5])<<16);
+ b+=k[2]+(((uint32_t)k[3])<<16);
+ a+=k[0]+(((uint32_t)k[1])<<16);
+ break;
+ case 11: c+=((uint32_t)k8[10])<<16; /* fall through */
+ case 10: c+=k[4];
+ b+=k[2]+(((uint32_t)k[3])<<16);
+ a+=k[0]+(((uint32_t)k[1])<<16);
+ break;
+ case 9 : c+=k8[8]; /* fall through */
+ case 8 : b+=k[2]+(((uint32_t)k[3])<<16);
+ a+=k[0]+(((uint32_t)k[1])<<16);
+ break;
+ case 7 : b+=((uint32_t)k8[6])<<16; /* fall through */
+ case 6 : b+=k[2];
+ a+=k[0]+(((uint32_t)k[1])<<16);
+ break;
+ case 5 : b+=k8[4]; /* fall through */
+ case 4 : a+=k[0]+(((uint32_t)k[1])<<16);
+ break;
+ case 3 : a+=((uint32_t)k8[2])<<16; /* fall through */
+ case 2 : a+=k[0];
+ break;
+ case 1 : a+=k8[0];
+ break;
+ case 0 : return c; /* zero length requires no mixing */
+ }
+
+ } else { /* need to read the key one byte at a time */
+ const uint8_t *k = (const uint8_t *)key;
+
+ /*--------------- all but the last block: affect some 32 bits of (a,b,c) */
+ while (length > 12)
+ {
+ a += k[0];
+ a += ((uint32_t)k[1])<<8;
+ a += ((uint32_t)k[2])<<16;
+ a += ((uint32_t)k[3])<<24;
+ b += k[4];
+ b += ((uint32_t)k[5])<<8;
+ b += ((uint32_t)k[6])<<16;
+ b += ((uint32_t)k[7])<<24;
+ c += k[8];
+ c += ((uint32_t)k[9])<<8;
+ c += ((uint32_t)k[10])<<16;
+ c += ((uint32_t)k[11])<<24;
+ mix(a,b,c);
+ length -= 12;
+ k += 12;
+ }
+
+ /*-------------------------------- last block: affect all 32 bits of (c) */
+ switch(length) /* all the case statements fall through */
+ {
+ case 12: c+=((uint32_t)k[11])<<24;
+ case 11: c+=((uint32_t)k[10])<<16;
+ case 10: c+=((uint32_t)k[9])<<8;
+ case 9 : c+=k[8];
+ case 8 : b+=((uint32_t)k[7])<<24;
+ case 7 : b+=((uint32_t)k[6])<<16;
+ case 6 : b+=((uint32_t)k[5])<<8;
+ case 5 : b+=k[4];
+ case 4 : a+=((uint32_t)k[3])<<24;
+ case 3 : a+=((uint32_t)k[2])<<16;
+ case 2 : a+=((uint32_t)k[1])<<8;
+ case 1 : a+=k[0];
+ break;
+ case 0 : return c;
+ }
+ }
+
+ final(a,b,c);
+ return c;
+}
+
ks_rwl_t *rwl;
ks_mutex_t *mutex;
uint32_t readers;
+ ks_size_t keysize;
+ ks_hash_mode_t mode;
};
/*****************************************************************************/
static inline unsigned int
hash(ks_hash_t *h, void *k)
{
- /* Aim to protect against poor hash functions by adding logic here
- * - logic taken from java 1.4 ks_hash source */
- unsigned int i = h->hashfn(k);
- i += ~(i << 9);
- i ^= ((i >> 14) | (i << 18)); /* >>> */
- i += (i << 4);
- i ^= ((i >> 10) | (i << 22)); /* >>> */
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ if (h->mode == KS_HASH_MODE_ARBITRARY) {
+ i = ks_hash_default_arbitrary(k, h->keysize, 13);
+ } else {
+ i = h->hashfn(k);
+ }
+
+ /* Aim to protect against poor hash functions by adding logic here
+ * - logic taken from java 1.4 hash source */
+
+ i += ~(i << 9);
+ i ^= ((i >> 14) | (i << 18)); /* >>> */
+ i += (i << 4);
+ i ^= ((i >> 10) | (i << 22)); /* >>> */
+
return i;
}
h->flags = flags;
}
+KS_DECLARE(void) ks_hash_set_keysize(ks_hash_t *h, ks_size_t keysize)
+{
+ h->keysize = keysize;
+}
+
KS_DECLARE(void) ks_hash_set_destructor(ks_hash_t *h, ks_hash_destructor_t destructor)
{
h->destructor = destructor;
{
ks_hash_t *h;
unsigned int pindex, size = primes[0];
+ ks_size_t keysize = 0;
switch(mode) {
case KS_HASH_MODE_CASE_INSENSITIVE:
ks_assert(eqf == NULL);
hashf = ks_hash_default_int;
eqf = ks_hash_equalkeys_int;
+ keysize = 4;
break;
case KS_HASH_MODE_INT64:
ks_assert(hashf == NULL);
ks_assert(eqf == NULL);
hashf = ks_hash_default_int64;
eqf = ks_hash_equalkeys_int64;
+ keysize = 8;
break;
case KS_HASH_MODE_PTR:
ks_assert(hashf == NULL);
ks_assert(eqf == NULL);
hashf = ks_hash_default_ptr;
eqf = ks_hash_equalkeys_ptr;
+ keysize = sizeof(void *);
+ break;
+ case KS_HASH_MODE_ARBITRARY:
+ keysize = sizeof(void *);
break;
default:
break;
h->pool = pool;
h->flags = flags;
h->destructor = destructor;
+ h->keysize = keysize;
+ h->mode = mode;
if ((flags & KS_HASH_FLAG_RWLOCK)) {
ks_rwl_create(&h->rwl, h->pool);
return h->entrycount;
}
+static int key_equals(ks_hash_t *h, void *k1, void *k2)
+{
+ if (h->mode == KS_HASH_MODE_ARBITRARY) {
+ return !memcmp(k1, k2, h->keysize);
+ } else {
+ return h->eqfn(k1, k2);
+ }
+}
+
static void * _ks_hash_remove(ks_hash_t *h, void *k, unsigned int hashvalue, unsigned int index) {
/* TODO: consider compacting the table when the load factor drops enough,
* or provide a 'compact' method. */
e = *pE;
while (NULL != e) {
/* Check hash value to short circuit heavier comparison */
- if ((hashvalue == e->h) && (h->eqfn(k, e->k))) {
+ if ((hashvalue == e->h) && (key_equals(h, k, e->k))) {
*pE = e->next;
h->entrycount--;
v = e->v;
e = h->table[index];
while (NULL != e) {
/* Check hash value to short circuit heavier comparison */
- if ((hashvalue == e->h) && (h->eqfn(k, e->k))) {
+ if ((hashvalue == e->h) && (key_equals(h, k, e->k))) {
v = e->v;
break;
}
projects / thirdparty / freeswitch.git / commitdiff
