Document established Devicetree bindings maintainers review practices:
1. Compatibles should not use bus suffixes to encode the type of
interface, because the parent bus node defines that interface, e.g.
"vendor,device" instead of "vendor,device-i2c" + "vendor,device-spi".
2. If the compatible represents the device as a whole, it should not
contain the type of device in the name.
3. Filenames should match compatible. The best if match is 100%, but if
binding has multiple compatibles, then one of the fallbacks should be
used. Alternatively a genericish name is allowed if it follows
"vendor,device" style.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250713-dt-bindings-docs-v2-2-672c898054ae@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
fallback if appropriate. SoC-specific compatibles are also preferred for
the fallbacks.
+ - DON'T use bus suffixes to encode the type of interface device is using.
+ The parent bus node already implies that interface. DON'T add the type of
+ device, if the device cannot be anything else.
+
- DO use a vendor prefix on device-specific property names. Consider if
properties could be common among devices of the same class. Check other
existing bindings for similar devices.
- "syscon" is not a generic property. Use vendor and type, e.g.
"vendor,power-manager-syscon".
+- Bindings files should be named like compatible: vendor,device.yaml. In case
+ of multiple compatibles in the binding, use one of the fallbacks or a more
+ generic name, yet still matching compatible style.
+
Board/SoC .dts Files
====================