}
if (!ast_test_flag(req, SIP_PKT_IGNORE) && p->pendinginvite) {
- /* We already have a pending invite. Sorry. You are on hold. */
- p->glareinvite = seqno;
- transmit_response_reliable(p, "491 Request Pending", req);
- if (option_debug)
- ast_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Got INVITE on call where we already have pending INVITE, deferring that - %s\n", p->callid);
- /* Don't destroy dialog here */
- return 0;
+ if (!ast_test_flag(&p->flags[0], SIP_OUTGOING) && ast_test_flag(&p->flags[1], SIP_PAGE2_DIALOG_ESTABLISHED)) {
+ /* We have received a reINVITE on an incoming call to which we have sent a 200 OK but not yet received
+ * an ACK. According to RFC 5407, Section 3.1.4, the proper way to handle this race condition is to accept
+ * the reINVITE since we have established a dialog.
+ */
+
+ /* Note that this will both clear the pendinginvite flag and cancel the
+ * retransmission of the 200 OK. Basically, we're accepting this reINVITE as both an ACK
+ * and a reINVITE in one request.
+ */
+ __sip_ack(p, p->lastinvite, FLAG_RESPONSE, 0);
+ } else {
+ /* We already have a pending invite. Sorry. You are on hold. */
+ p->glareinvite = seqno;
+ transmit_response_reliable(p, "491 Request Pending", req);
+ if (option_debug)
+ ast_log(LOG_DEBUG, "Got INVITE on call where we already have pending INVITE, deferring that - %s\n", p->callid);
+ /* Don't destroy dialog here */
+ return 0;
+ }
}
p_replaces = get_header(req, "Replaces");