The skip_mtcfg descriptor flag is unused and expected to remain that
way. Drop it.
Single-tile platforms are already identified by a zero/unset value for
max_remote_tiles and don't need/use this flag to avoid trying to read
out multi-tile configuration. PVC is currently the only multi-tile
platform, and PVC uses MTCFG so this flag is not set. The current
expectation is that if/when future multi-tile platforms show up, they
will also use the MTCFG register in the same manner as PVC, meaning that
they won't have any need to set 'skip_mtcfg' either.
Even if a future platform does change how multi-tile configuration gets
probed (e.g., using some different register), simply doing an early return
from xe_info_probe_tile_count() would probably not be the correct logic
to handle that anyway.
Bspec: 53146
Reviewed-by: Xin Wang <x.wang@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260416-no-skip-mtcfg-v1-1-c8ea26d81530@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
u8 probe_display:1;
/** @info.skip_guc_pc: Skip GuC based PM feature init */
u8 skip_guc_pc:1;
- /** @info.skip_mtcfg: skip Multi-Tile configuration from MTCFG register */
- u8 skip_mtcfg:1;
/** @info.skip_pcode: skip access to PCODE uC */
u8 skip_pcode:1;
/** @info.needs_shared_vf_gt_wq: needs shared GT WQ on VF */
desc->has_sriov;
xe->info.has_sysctrl = desc->has_sysctrl;
xe->info.skip_guc_pc = desc->skip_guc_pc;
- xe->info.skip_mtcfg = desc->skip_mtcfg;
xe->info.skip_pcode = desc->skip_pcode;
xe->info.needs_scratch = desc->needs_scratch;
xe->info.needs_shared_vf_gt_wq = desc->needs_shared_vf_gt_wq;
if (xe->info.tile_count == 1)
return;
- if (xe->info.skip_mtcfg)
- return;
-
mmio = xe_root_tile_mmio(xe);
/*
u8 has_sysctrl:1;
u8 needs_scratch:1;
u8 skip_guc_pc:1;
- u8 skip_mtcfg:1;
u8 skip_pcode:1;
u8 needs_shared_vf_gt_wq:1;
};